Archive for February, 2005

Pressefreiheit in Kroatien

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2005

Pressefreiheit in Kroatien

Zeljko Peratovic im Gesprch mit Rubina Mhring, Prsidentin von Reporter ohne Grenzen sterreichWelchen Stellenwert hat Pressefreiheit in Ihrem Land?Es zeigte sich, dass die kritisch hinterfragenden Medien einen grsseren Beitrag an die demokratischen Entwicklung der kroatischen Gesellschaft leisteten als die verschiedenen politischen Parteien insgesamt. Dies wird in der letzten Zeit besonders beim Abtreten korumpierter Politiker offensichtlich; die sich ihrerseits nicht auf Druck anderer politischer Opponenten, sondern nur dank dem hartnckigem Bestreben verschiedener Journalisten mit grosser moralischen Autoritt zurckziehen.

Gibt es Medienkartelle, die die Meinungvielfalt einschnken?

Zu nennen wre Europa Press Holding, dessen Teilhaber die deutsche WAZ ist, und die sterreichische Styria, die den Vecernji list besitzt. Styria wird demnchst tglich in Kroatien ein Tabloid verffentlichen (24 Stunden), die EPH, welche schon zwei Tageszeitungen (Jutarnji list und Dnevnik) besitzt, wird wahrscheinlich der Kufer des Regionalblattes Slobodna Dalmacija sein.

Beeinflussen industrielle Unternehmen die Medien?

Ja, sie beeinflussen die Medien. Dennoch, obwohl man ber sehr viele interessante Themen bezglich der Geschftsgebarren der T kroatischen Telekom (dessen Hauptaktionr die Deutsche Telekom ist) rechechieren knnte, wird in den kroatischen Medien kritisch sehr wenig ber dieses Unternehmen berichtet. Eines der Grnde knnte auch sein, dass T HT medienmssig der grsste Werbekunde ist, dessen Re-branding letztes Jahr angeblich 3 Millionen Euro gekostet hatte.

Welchen Einfluss nimmt die Politik auf die Medien?

Dieser Einfluss wird seit dem Tod des ersten kroatischen Prsidenten Herr Franjo Tudjman im Jahre 1999 immer geringer und wird zusehends von den Eigentmern der Medien- und Marketingkartelle bernommen. Der politische Einfluss ist nur noch in den Medien, die noch immer im Staatseigentum (Das kroatische Fernseher, Slobodna Dalmacija, Vjesnik) geblieben sind, sprbar.

Gibt es Repressalien gegenber Journalisten?
Die Gerichte haben verschiedene Journalisten auf Verleumdung verurteilt, zugunsten von ehemaligen Staatsbeamten aus der Tudjman-rea, die gegen diese Journalisten geklagt haben. Es handelt sich hierbei um hohe Geldstrafen gegen die Verleger, aber auch bedingte Gefngnisstrafen. Die Geheimdienste ihrerseits ben weiterhin Druck auf Journalisten aus. Die Journalistin Helena Puljiz, welche von den Agenten der POA 5 Stunden verhrt und schikaniert wurde, bekam Genugtuung in der Weise, dass Prsident Mesic und Premier Sanader die Kndigung des Chefs der POA Josko Podbevsek unterzeichnet hatten. Aber, weder der Premier noch der Prsident fanden es ntig, die 6 Journalisten (Ivan Zvonimir Cicak, Davor Butkovic, Ivica Djikic, Boris Pavelic und Zeljko Peratovic, plus Marijo Kavain und Ivanka Toma) zu beschtzen, die von der POA als Agenten der britischen MI6 beschuldigt wurden.

President Stjepan Mesic’s biographer

Tuesday, February 15th, 2005

Zeljko Peratovic and Ivica Djikic

Opened letter to public

After appearance in weekly papers Globus from 4th February 2005. the article about, so called, presentation of former chief of Counterintelligence agency, Franjo Turek, after down signed journalists, on Monday 7th February, have sent to authorized state bodies, to investigate the facts by which Turek substantiated his thesis about several domestic journalists harnessed in the huge anticroatian conspiracy, in Croatia at the beginning of parliamentary investigation was started extremely disturbing actions of approval of POA (counterintelligence agency) procedures. We don’ t doubt that there will be more attempts to advocate the pursuit of journalists and to justify ripping in the privacy of journalists. From the circles of unnamed political officials, and the journalists who advocate unscrupulous dealings with their colleagues and non-likeminded persons, the public is attempted to convict that marked journalists are indeed foreign intelligence and national betrayers. The action has just started , and next days by the threats that are coming from the journalist group, who took the task to protect secret police from the colleagues it is to expect and evidences about our national betrayal.

Since our experience teach us that labeles like that in Croatia can be unpleasant and dangerous for our security, we inform our public and state institutions that we will about this dangerous tendency inform foreign bodies: all international journalist assoiations and organizations for protection of human rights.

Also, from parliamentary investigation team and colleagues journalists, we ask to down signed journalists don’ t treat as some group, because we are not except in Franjo Turek’s imagination members of any mutual group. Each of us has his name and surname and the biography, so we please to treat us that way: we hope, namely, that group lynching of people, which was in this country years-long praxis, today began to serve as a warning, and not as a model.

Journalists:
Ivanka Toma Jutarnji list
Marijo Kavain Jutarnji list
Gordan Malic Globus
Ivica Djikic Feral Tribune
Zeljko Peratovic Vjesnik

In Zagreb, 14 February 2005.

Gotovina & POA & Journalists

Friday, February 11th, 2005

Overhearing: The affair about tracking five Croatian journalists provokes the attention and stormy reactions even in Committee for journalists protection in New York

Alex Lupis: The affair could slow down the enter of Croatia into EU

Author: Jadranka Juresko-Kero

We are familiar with the newest events about POA (counterintelligence agency) and overhearing of journalists in Croatia. We got the informations that during 2003. and 2004. five journalists were tracked and accused for collaboration with foreign secret services.

After the case of journalist Helena Puljiz, and this new affair, we conclude that some members of political elite still preserve old comunist look on independent journalism, and with their behaviour they confirm that independent journalists are threath, with these words Alexandar Lupis, the counselor for Europe in Committee for journalists protection in New York, has confirmed for Vecernji list that in their American headquarters came official report about problems that Croatian journalists facing with.

Not wanting to uncover with who of this five journalists are in conntact, because they want to protect that person from another discomfort, Lupis said that New York Committee for journalists protection expres sorrow because Croatian government still didn’ t manage to implant democratic standards of behaviour of intelligence service.
Lupis claimed that behaviour like that could have negative affect on process of integration of Croatia in EU.When he was asked to evaluate the grade of journalist freedom in Croatia, Lupis said that his Office thought that the political need of Croatian intelligence services to control independent journalists was a serious problem. Lupis emphasized that the newest affair, like the one with Helena Puljiz, sign that some politicians in Croatia think that journalists and medias should serve only to the state and the ruling party, and not to the readers. About the affair of new overhearing connected with former chief of POA, Franjo Turek, President Stjepan Mesic, said that he saw computor presentation, but there were no names of journalists given in Globus.

But, the change of Turek itself is a proof that security system didn’ t work as it should have, said Mesic.

CROATIA: Journalists demand inquiry into alleged abuses by security agency

New York, February 10, 2005

Five independent Croatian journalists filed a petition on Monday requesting that the government investigate allegations that the Counter-Intelligence Agency (POA) tried to discredit them after they reported on sensitive war crimes issues, according to local and international press reports. The journalists called for an inquiry after the February 4 edition of the independent Zagreb weekly magazine Globus published a POA document titled “Information on intelligence-media manipulation,” which accused the journalists of working for foreign security services in order to discredit the government and impede integration with the European Union. According to a March 2004 presentation that POA Director Franjo Turek gave to senior government officials, the agency had conducted surveillance against the journalists in 2003 and 2004 and accused them of espionage after they reported on the government’s failure to arrest war criminals indicted by the Hague-based International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. The five journalists are: Gordan Malic of Globus; Ivica Djikic of the independent Split weekly magazine Feral Tribune; Marijo Kavain and Ivanka Toma of the independent Zagreb daily Jutarnji List; and Zeljko Peratovic of the Zagreb state daily Vjesnik. The journalists have filed the petition with the Parliament, attorney general, and Council for the Civilian Supervision of Security Services. The council held an initial hearing on the matter yesterday. During the 1990s, the nationalist HDZ government relied on security services to persecute independent journalists. Reformist governments since 2000 have made limited progress in changing the politicized agencies. In October 2004, POA agents threatened and attempted to blackmail independent journalist Helena Puljiz into becoming a POA informant.

Croatia: Journalist wiretapped again

The special working group of the Parliamentary Committee for Internal Affairs and National Security is opening an investigation today over Croatian Counter Intelligence service (CIS). The principal cause for the investigation is the recent public address of five journalists who were the subject of secret treatment of the CIS during 2003 and 2004, under the allegation that they have deliberately published wrong information about Hague fugitive general Gotovina in order to obstruct Croatia to enter the European Union. (11-FEB-05)

The special parliamentary working group was formed after five Croatian journalists Gordan Malic, Zeljko Peratovic, Ivanka Toma, Mario Kavain and Ivica Djikic have sent an official request to the Croatian Journalist Association, Civic Committee for the Oversight of the Secret Services, Parliamentary Committees for National Security and Human Rights to examine the allegations from the text published in newsweek magazine Globus, in which the author Gordan Malic claimes that the CIS was conducting a secret operation against the above mentioned journalists, accusing them of media-intelligence operation against Croatia.

Namely, mentioned news article brings a document called Information about media-intelligence manipulation aiming to discredit Croatia which was presented in March 2004 to the President Mesic, Prime Minister Sanader, Minister of the Judiciary Skare-Ozbolt and Minister of the Internal Affairs Mlinaric by Franjo Turek, former director of the CIS. In short, the document of the CIS accuses the journalists for planed and coordinated misinforming, which prevented respective bodies from arresting general Gotovina.
-In my opinion the reason why the authorities in charge didnt react upon the receival of the report from the CIS is because they were only concerned with how the report is going to look like to Carla del Ponte. said Zarko Puhovski, the Chairman of the Croatian Helsinki Committee.

According to the CIS, except from journalists, several higher state officials also participated in the media intelligence operation against Croatia. Judging by the documents published in the media, the CIS permanently wiretaped Ranko Ostojic, the former Head of the Croatian police in charge of arresting general Gotovina and former spokesperson of the Ministry of the Interior Zinka Bardic.

The Civic Committee for Oversight of the Secret Services and the Parliamentary Committee for Internal Affairs and National Security will decide in the coming days whether the secret listening to the above mentioned Croatian citizens was illegal or not. However, the latest affairs related to the work of the CIS, including the Puljiz affair, raised some serious questions about the overall situation of the Secret Services and the way they function in Croatia.

POA, Prezentacija, Globus

Friday, February 11th, 2005

Five reporters urge investigation into reports that they were under surveillance by POA
ZAGREB, Feb 7 (Hina) – Five Croatian journalists on Monday sent a letter to the Croatian Journalists’ Association (HND), parliamentary committees on national security and human rights, and the Council for the Civilian Supervision of Intelligence Services, urging an investigation into an article from the Globus weekly saying that the Counterintelligence Agency (POA), led by its former chief Franjo Turek, had tapped their phones in 2003 and 2004 because they were suspected of participating in a media-intelligence campaign against Croatia.
Reporters Gordan Malic of the Globus weekly, Zeljko Peratovic of the Vjesnik daily, Mario Kavain of the Jutarnji List daily and Ivica Djikic of the Feral Tribune weekly said their request referred to the article of February 4 headlined “Turek’s Presentation“, which contained POA documents which they said constituted a grave libel on their work.
The reporters said that a POA document, published in the article under the title “Information on intelligence-media manipulation aimed at discrediting Croatia”, covered their articles on investigations by the Hague war crimes tribunal, the functioning of security services etc., describing their work as “a premeditated, organised and coordinated campaign to disseminate misinformation jeopardising national security”.
The reporters warned that the document bore proof that some of them, including journalist and “Jutarnji List” editor Davor Butkovic, were placed under temporary surveillance by the POA in 2003 and 2004 and that Peratovic and Boris Pavelic of the Novi List daily were also believed to have been under surveillance.
“We have therefore concluded that during the term of its former chief Franjo Turek, the POA acted unlawfully against a number of Croatian journalists to construe the monstrous ‘Information on intelligence-media manipulation aimed at discrediting Croatia’ and depict our articles as dangerous for national security,” reads the joint request of the five journalists.
Notwithstanding the dark past of our secret services, this kind of campaign against journalists is unprecedented,” reads the request
The journalists urged the HND, the parliamentary committees and the Council for the Civilian Supervision of Intelligence Services to respond to the latest article considering that senior government officials have denied the existence of such a presentation or that the POA acted unlawfully in this case.
They also urged the HND to inform domestic and foreign public of their case and request a response from state institutions, as well as to press charges against those responsible for the case.
According to the Globus weekly, the POA stated that the said journalists and several foreign reporters were suspected of swaying the public opinion in Croatia in collusion with individuals from foreign institutions by disseminating misinformation about the whereabouts of General Ante Gotovina, who is wanted by the Hague war crimes tribunal.
The POA document read that by doing so the reporters were discrediting Croatian institutions, exerting pressure on Croatia and slowing down its integration into the European Union.
(Hina) 07.02.2005. 14:45 MET
Enis ZEBIĆ
Petero hrvatskih novinara Gordan Malić iz Globusa, Ivanka Toma i Mario Kavajin iz Jutarnjeg lista, Ivica Đikić iz Ferala i eljko Peratović iz Vjesnika, uputilo je danas zahtjev Hrvatskom novinarskom drutvu, saborskim odborima za nacionalnu sigurnost i ljudska prava, te Vijeću za civilni nadzor sigurnosnih slubi, kojim trae da istrae navode iz tjednika Globus kako ih je Protuobavjetajna agencija (POA), na čelu s bivim ravnateljem Franjom Turekom, tijekom 2003. i 2004. godine prislukivala pod sumnjom da sudjeluju u medijsko-obavjetajnoj kampanji protiv Hrvatske. Oni se pozivaju na tekst u najnovijem broju ovog tjednika, pod naslovom Turekova prezentacija, u kojemu su objavljeni dokumenti POA-e kojima se, tvrde novinari, teko kleveće njihov rad.
Detalje u izjavi za Radio Slobodna Evropa pojanjava novinar Vjesnika eljko Peratović:
Reagiramo sada na potvrđene informacije da nas je POA nadzirala, obrađivala i prezentirala na novinarski rad dravnom vrhu kao neprijateljsku djelatnost, usmjerenu protiv interesa Republike Hrvatske, a koja se očitovala u irenju dezinformacija da je general Gotovina u Hrvatskoj, a za račun britanske tajne slube. Mi se protivimo tim klevetama Protuobavjetajne agencije, smatramo da smo nezakonito nadzirani, da je POA trebala obavljati svoj posao i traiti generala Gotovinu, a ne nadzirati novinare.
Peratović, kojem ovo nije prvi put da zbog novinarskog rada ima posla sa tajnim slubama, vjeruje da bi inicijativa petero novinara mogla imati dalekosene pozitivne posljedice:
Mislim da će ovo to je objavio kolega Malić i ova naa zajednička inicijativa doprinijeti tome da se to napokon račisti, da ovaj put novinari neće posluiti kao sredstvo zapravo moda nekim viim političkim ciljevima, nekim političkim obračunima, ili da se smijeni ef neke tajne slube da bi se doveo neki drugi. Mislim da bi to trebalo na koncu i rezultirati kaznenom prijavom protiv odgovornih. Do sada mi imamo i naslijeđe Udbe s kojim nismo račistili, nasljeđe Tuđmanovih tajnih slubi koje su se bavile ne samo prislukivanjem novinara nego i ratnim zločinima i vercale drogu i to do sada nije bilo sankcionirano. Nadam se da je prilika da se naprosto jednom podvuče crta i da netko od tih efova kazneno odgovara, a ne samo da podnese ostavku, pa da mu kasnije predsjednik drave ili premijer ponudi mjesto u diplomaciji.
Predsjednik Hrvatskog novinarskog drutva Dragutin Lučić Luce upozorava u izjavi za Radio Slobodna Evropa da se, čini se, sprema i kaznena prijava protiv autora tog teksta u tjedniku Globus, Gordana Malića, jer je objavio dokument sa oznakom dravne tajne:
Međutim, treba podsjetiti na pozitivno zakonodavstvo u Hrvatskoj i na stavove Međunarodnog suda za ljudska prava u Strasburu i na ostale konvencije koje tite ljudska prava i medijske slobode, u kojima se doslovce kae da je novinar slobodan od svake optube kad objavi bilo koji dokument, pa i tajni, ukoliko je to motivirano posebnim javnim interesom, a to je u ovom slučaju posve bjelodano. Naime, o tom se dokumentu već govori mjesecima i on je vie-manje cijeloj javnosti poznat. Moda je tek sad po prvi put u jednom originalnom obliku ugledao svjetlo dana.
Predsjednik Novinarskog drutva, Lučić, sastat će se u srijedu sa petero prozvanih novinara, kako bi dogovorili dalje akcije.
Radio Slobodna Evropa 07. 02. 2005., 18,30 h

Novinari trae istragu o navodima da ih je prislukivala POA

Petero novinara poslalo je zahtjev slubenim organima za pokretanjem istrage o navodima iznesenim u Globusu – da ih je Protuobavjetajna agencija pod ravnanjem Franje Tureka tijekom 2003. i 2004. prislukivala pod sumnjom da sudjeluju u medijsko-obavjetajnoj kampanji protiv Hrvatske.
Traimo da se ispita famozna prezentacija Franje Tureka u kojoj je on optuio niz hrvatskih novinara da rade za britansku tajnu slubu i servisiraju domaće obavjetajno podzemlje ireći dezinformacije da je general Gotovina u Hrvatskoj., rekao nam je jedan od prozvanih novinara, eljko Peratović.
Kolege u istom sosu su Gordan Malić, Ivanka Toma, Mario Kavain i Ivica Đikić. U toj prezentaciji koju je proli tjedan objavio tjednik Globus, vidljivo je da su neki novinari bili izloeni mjerama tajnog nadzora, da su fotografirani i da su im prislukivani telefoni. Traimo, ne samo da se utvrdi da li je bilo nezakonitog postupanja POA-e, nego da se ispita da li jo uvijek imamo dossier u POA-i, zato nas se klevetalo da smo strani pijuni, i zato se POA bavila nama umjesto Gotovinom i njegovim pomagačima., dodao je Peratović. Iako je tajnim dokumentom koji je objavio Globus uvtrđeno da su neki od novinara, uključujući Davora Butkovića bili pod mjerama nadzora POA-e, bivi ravnatelj Turek tvrdi da je sve rađeno po zakonu i da nije bilo nikakvih prislukivanja. Franjo, osim toga, tvrdi da nisu praćeni novinari već strani obavjetajci, a da su novinari s njima kontaktirali pa su, valjda, postali dijelom istrage. Kako pie Jutarnji list, Turek kae da je POA pratila strane obavjetajce, a ne djelatnike Hakog suda, bez obzira kako se oni uokolo predstavljaju. Prema objavljenoj prezentaciji vidljivo je da je POA nadzirala i biveg ravnatelja policije Ranka Ostojića te glasnogovornicu MUP-a Zinku Bardić. Kao to je poznato, Protuobavjetajna agencija podnijela je kaznenu prijavu protiv nepoznatih počinitelja zbog odavanja dravne tajne tekstovima u tjedniku Globus. Potpisnik tekstova je Gordan Malić, koji pretpostavlja da se kaznena prijava odnosi na njega.
Radio 101, Aktualni 101, 07. 02. 2005., 18