Human Rights -Alliance - pour les Droits de l’Homme

5432 NEUENHOF , CP/POBox -105 Switzerland/Suisse EMail : humright.alliance@tele2.ch

June 2008- Part I

Council of Europe - Council of Ministers

For att. of Mr. Carl BILD, President

In the name of several NGOs, we take the liberty to make a proposal:

The Proposal to the Council of Foreign Affaires Ministries of the Council of Europe to form an unit to control and supervise the works of some judges of the ECHR. It must be an independent unit outside any influence. It does not mean the suppression of the judges’ independence. It is a kind of ‘European Judicial Council’ composed of respected jurists, judges, lawyers and professors of law. The majority should come from Western Democracies where ‘human rights’ has been respected for generations. The mistake made by the ECHR should be avoided: A large democracy like the UK, France gives one judge like a small Azerbaijan, Georgia, Moldavia where no respect human rights and oppressions are a part of every day. The judges were chosen solely for political reasons..

No body is about the law and everybody has a share of responsibility. The judges today have much power; they do not have the same ‘dose’ of responsibility? Too much power without responsibilities leads to abuse and to the chaos.

The purpose of the ECHR - European Court of Human Rights was, as it was founded, to protect Human Rights and to make legal improvements for the well being of humanity. That is not the case anymore. The Council of Ministers of the Council of Europe at the 116 sessions of 18/19th May 2006 concluded that more than 90% complaints were rejected without any valid reason. Today’s situation is even worse, observers are talking about 95-97% of rejected complaints.

The behaviour of the ECHR is unique in the world. When somebody presents a complaint at the begin he receives from the ECHR the number of his case. If the accuser requires acknowledgement of delivered documents, he never receives an answer. After 2 -3 years he receives in 95% of cases a negative answer-see :

a) Your request is not-admitted you do not satisfy articles 34 and 35 of the Convention

b) Based on documentations, the ECHR does not see any violation of your rights granted by the Convention.

c) This decision is definitive. You have no possibility of appeal. Your acts will be de destroyed.

We will present to the community a few cases of members of our NGO with scanned documents and proofs in French or English. We ask you to spend 30-40 min, you will easily understand how the Human rights ( Protocol 11) are violated by National Justice and approved by the ECHR in the 21st century. That is one of more than 50000 cases rejected and declared non-admitted every year by the ECHR. This number is growing and represents a new kind of perfidious juridical corruption and confiscation of proprieties, spread over Europe with unpredictable consequences. History teaches us that corruption, especially juridical is poison, for any progress of society.

Roman empire based on discipline, civic conscience, state of law created an exceptional civilisation with very modest technical means, lasted 1200 years. The fall of Rom in 476 is result of massively increased corruption more than the attacks of Odakars.

CROATIA is the best example how the corruption (juridical) can destroy a country quickly. Remember 18 years ago Croatia was considerably richer than any other, except Slovenia, country that jointed the EU in 2004. Today Cyprus has a 2.5 time higher GDP/ head. Ireland and Croatia are so similar and so different. Twenty years ago Ireland was three times poorer today 3 times richer. After Israel Croatia has the largest percentage of Diaspora in the world (1′300′000 left in last 30 years and 1′400′000 in the period before, all together 2.7 millions or app. 40 % live abroad). Some of them came back at the beginning of the nineties - lost everything and returned where they come from. The normal conditions to create the healthy activities do not exist. Concerning the protection (juridical) The World Bank DB for 2007 put Croatia on 156th position (only a few Central African countries are behind). These facts are crucial for whole nation - 18 years ago a relatively rich Croatia is now selling everything: 94% of all banks, Pliva (pharmaceutical) last year, this year INA (petrol) and in spite of Sales OFF, debts are massively increasing. The last data concerning the external debts was 54 Billions $. Forecast for the end 2008, 63 Billions $ (10 times higher then 9 years ago). Internal and personal debts are increasing with the similar speed. More indebted then Argentina at the time of its financial collapse, how long Croatia can stand without major financial crises? How it will finish? - poor citizens might lose another 40-45% of their income

A. Petric - PhD, HRA-Switzerland