Archive for the ‘Freedom of speech’ Category

Les poursuites juridiques à l’encontre de Zeljko Peratovic toujours infondées

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE

13 mai 2009

Croatie

Les poursuites juridiques à l’encontre de Zeljko Peratovic toujours infondées

_____

Activists from the Paris-based press freedom group Reporters Without Borders, Robert Menard, left, Vincent Brossel, center, and Jean-Francois Julliard, right

Activists from the Paris-based press freedom group Reporters Without Borders, Robert Menard, left, Vincent Brossel, center, and Jean-Francois Julliard, right

________________________________________________________________

Reporters sans frontières dénonce le maintien des poursuites ouvertes le 14 janvier 2008 à l’encontre du journaliste Zeljko Peratovic, à la demande du ministre de l’Intérieur Tomislav Karamarko, qui l’accuse d’avoir contrevenu à l’article 322/1 KZA du code pénal prescrivant une peine de prison d’un an et des amendes « pour toute personne qui diffuserait des informations de nature à inquiéter la population ».

Le ministre de l’Intérieur avait déjà été auditionné une première fois à l’issue de quoi il s’était avéré incapable d’apporter la preuve que les éléments juridiques du délit étaient réunis. En convoquant le 11 mai 2009 Tomislav Karamarko pour une seconde audition, la juge lui donnait une nouvelle occasion de défendre sa position à l’aide de témoins membres de son entourage proche. En vain.

« Il est désormais plus que temps de clôturer ce dossier qui ne repose sur aucun fondement. Les poursuites établies sur la base de l’article 322/1 sont inconsistantes et irrecevables. La notion ‘’d’information de nature à inquiéter la population’’ constitue une vision obsolète de la liberté d’expression », a déclaré Reporters sans frontières.

« Malgré l’opportunité ouverte par cette seconde audition, le ministre n’a manifestement toujours pas les moyens de prouver le bien-fondé de ses accusations. Les liens de Tomislav Karamarko avec les témoins cités résument bien toute la partialité des poursuites engagées. Le public « inquiété par les informations publiées » par Zeljko Peratovic peut-il être raisonnablement réduit à cinq personnes, membres de la famille du ministre ou anciens collaborateurs du service des renseignements qu’il dirigeait auparavant? », a ajouté l’organisation.

« Nous demandons aux autorités judiciaires en charge du dossier d’annuler toutes les poursuites ouvertes à l’encontre de Zeljko Peratovic », a conclu Jean-François Julliard, secrétaire général de Reporters sans frontières.

Sur ses blogs (peratovic.net et peratovic.blog.hr), Zeljko Peratovic a dénoncé l’obstruction pratiquée par Tomislav Karamarko dans l’enquête sur la mort de Milan Levar, un témoin protégé du Tribunal pénal international pour l’ex-Yougoslavie (TPIY) décédé dans l’explosion de sa voiture, le 28 août 2000 à Gospic.

47, rue Vivienne – 75002 Paris (France)

Tel : 33 1 44 83 84 67 – Fax : 33 1 45 23 11 51

rsf_eu@rsf.org – Plus d’informations å www.rsf.org

  • Share/Bookmark

Interior minister fails again to support charges against journalist

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

PRESS RELEASE

13 may 2009

Croatia

Interior minister fails again to support charges against journalist

_____________________________________________________________________

Reporters Without Borders condemns a court decision to continue investigating the charge of “disseminating information likely to upset the population” under article 322/1 of the criminal code that was brought against journalist Zeljko Peratovic in January at the behest at interior minister Tomislav Karamarko. It carries a maximum sentence of a year in prison as well as a possible fine.

Karamarko initiated the case against Peratovic because of allegations he made in two blogs, peratovic.net and peratovic.blog.hr, accusing Karamarko of obstructing the investigation into the death of Milan Levar, a witness under the protection of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), who was killed by a car bomb in Gospic in August 2000.

Karamarko failed to produce any legally sound evidence against Peratovic when he was initially questioned in court. A second hearing was held in the case on 11 May at which the minister was given another chance. He brought several aides and close associates along to testify but he again failed to support the charge.

“It is high time to close this case, which has no foundation,” Reporters Without Borders said. “The charges under article 322/1 are inconsistent and should be dismissed. The very concept of ‘information likely to upset the population’ is based on an obsolete idea of free expression.

“Despite being given another opportunity at this second hearing, the interior minister still clearly lacks the means to support his allegations. His ties to those who were summoned to testify highlight the lack of impartiality in this case. Is the population that is supposedly ‘upset’ by Peratovic’s information limited to these five people, all relatives of the minister or members of the intelligence agency he used to head?”

Reporters Without Borders added: “We urge the judicial authorities in charge of this case to dismiss all the charges against Peratovic.”

  • Share/Bookmark

Judicial harassment of war crimes reporter continues

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Judicial harassment of war crimes reporter continues

Croatia, 15. 01. 2009

Reporters Without Borders condemns the charge that was brought yesterday at the behest at interior minister Tomislav Karamarko against a journalist who writes about war crimes in the 1990s. Zeljko Peratovic is accused of “disseminating information likely to upset the population” under article 322/1 KZA of the criminal code, which carries a maximum sentence of a year in prison as well as a possible fine.

In blog entries (peratovic.net and peratovic.blog.hr), letters to national judicial officials and a series of public statements, Peratovic has accused the interior minister of obstructing the investigation into the death of Milan Levar, a witness under the protection of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), who was killed by a car bomb in the southeastern village of Gospic in August 2000.

Peratovic was questioned as a witness in the course of the investigation because he was one of the last people to see Levar alive. The prosecutor in charge of the investigation subsequently identified Peratovic as a witness, in violation of judicial confidentiality.

“Interior minister Karamarko portrays himself as the victim of defamation and claims that I want to upset the population, but he is pursuing a different objective” Peratovic said. “As well as fining me, the court could above all decide to ban me from disseminating information for an indefinite period. That would prevent be from undertaking any kind of journalistic activity, on my blog or in other media.”

Peratovic added : “It would also prevent me from continuing my effort to discover who was behind Milan Levar’s murder. Some people are counting on the statute of limitations eventually applying to this case. Silencing me could be a way of achieving this.”

Reporters Without Borders said : “It seems that press investigations into war crimes are not welcome at a time when Croatia is trying to join the European Union. The interior minister should be trying to help the investigation into a protected witness’s murder rather than attacking those who refuse to let war crimes be forgotten and go unpunished.”

“The prosecution being brought against Peratovic under article 322/1 is ridiculous and unacceptable,” the press freedom organisation continued. “The crime of ‘information likely to upset the population’ reflects on obsolete view of freedom of expression that is incompatible with the European democratic standards that Croatia will have to conform to if it wants to join the EU.”

Reporters Without Borders added : “If the prosecution of Peratovic goes ahead, we insist that whenever any of the parties are questioned in court, it no longer takes place behind closed doors.”

Zeljko Peratovic, who received death threats in 2008 in the form of comments added to his blog, was arrested at his home on 17 October 2007 on a charge of revealing state secret for posting documents on his blog relating to war crimes in Gospic in the 1990s, and for referring to the existence of a video of witness accusing former defence minister Gojko Susak (now deceased) and a parliamentary deputy president (Darko Milinovic, now croatian minister of th health and new vice president of HDZ, op. 45 lines) of involvement.

Aged 42, he faced a possible three-year prison sentence. In the event, the prosecution was not pursued but the charges have not been withdrawn and the files confiscated by the police have still not been returned to him.

Peratovic has worked for various newspapers, the latest of which is Vjesnik. His investigations into war crimes have earned him a lot of trouble. He has been fired, he has been physically attacked and he is regarded as a traitor by many of his compatriots, who refuse outright to consider the possibility that Croatians may have committed war crimes.

He received the received the press freedom prize of the Reporters Without Borders Austrian section in 2003.

RSF, Publié le 15 janvier 2009

  • Share/Bookmark

Les autorités croates s’en prennent à la fille du journaliste Zeljko Peratovic

Monday, June 15th, 2009

Zeljko Peratovic, journaliste croate indépendant, persécuté par les autorités croates en raison de ses investigations sur les crimes de guerre et les liens entre le crime organisé, le milieu politique et les structures de renseignements a reçu, aujourd’hui dimanche 14 juin 2009, une convocation de la police de Zagreb, commissariat n°7, d’avoir à se présenter le 16 juin 2009 à 12.30 auprès des services sociaux pour des prétendus faits de “comportement indécent envers sa fille” âgée de 5 ans et demi, également convoquée. Cette convocation fait suite à une dénonciation anonyme, moyen couramment utilisé dans les anciens pays communises pour placer des accusations montées de toutes pièces. Au delà des persécutions policières et judiciaires qu’elles infligent au journaliste indépendant depuis des années, les autorités croates s’en prennent aujourd’hui à sa famille et pire, à son enfant. Ces accusations infondées relèvent de la plus abjecte manipulation et visent à isoler encore plus le journaliste, à le placer au ban de la société et à détruire sa famille.

Karamarko (ministre de l’Intérieur) et Mesic (Président de la République) n’en sont pas à leur coup d’essai : après avoir interné de force à l’asile psychiatrique de Zagreb tant l’avocate Ana Jendris-Jelesic (lui faisant croire que son fils avait été liquidé) que Mirjana Pukanic, après avoir menacé de m’y interner en raison du dossier Tomulic et après s’en être pris à la fille de Mirjana Pukanic au moyen du même centre d’aide sociale, ces derniers appliquent les mêmes méthodes pour s’en prendre à Zeljko Peratovic et sa famille.

Au delà, ces accusations constituent clairement une menace dirigée contre la fille du journaliste dans un pays où encore très récemment était froidement abattue la fille d’un avocat “ciblé” afin de faire pression sur lui. En s’en prenant à la fille de Zeljko Peratovic, en basant de nouvelles pressions sur l’enfant de la personne “ciblée”, les autorités croates montrant qu’elles utilisent les mêmes méthodes que les assassins d’Ivana Hodak et font officiellement peser sur Zeljko Peratovic et sa famille les plus grandes inquiétudes pour leur sécurité et leur intégrité physique.

Blog de l’avocat Ivan JURASINOVIC, le 15/06/09 – 00:23

  • Share/Bookmark

Kroatischer Journalist Zeljko Peratovic von Innenminister verklagt

Monday, January 26th, 2009

Kroatischer Journalist Zeljko Peratovic von Innenminister verklagt

Der kroatische Journalist Zeljko Peratovic, bekannt für seine Berichte über Kriegsverbrechen im ehemaligen Jugoslawien während der 1990er Jahre, ist vom kroatischen Innenminister Tomislav Karamarko angeklagt worden. Er wird beschuldigt, Informationen veröffentlicht zu haben, die “zu Aufregung in der Bevölkerung” führen könnte, so die Anklage, die sich nach Artikel 322/1 KZA des Strafgesetzes richtet und maximal ein Jahr Gefängnis sowie eine mögliche Geldstrafe beinhaltet.

Peratovic hatte in seinen Blogeinträgen (peratovic.net und peratovic.blog.hr) Briefe an nationale Justizbeamte sowie eine Reihe von öffentlichen Statements publiziert. Er beschuldigte darin den Innenminister, die Untersuchungen zum Tod des Zeugen vor dem Internationalen Tribunal für Kriegsverbrecher im ehemaligen Jugoslawien, Milan Levar, zu behindern. Levar wurde im Jahr 2000 Opfer eines Autobombenattentats.

Peratovic, einer der letzten, die Levar lebend gesehen hatten, wurde als Zeuge in Ermittlungen um den Anschlag befragt. Der Journalist vermutet eine bestimmte Absicht hinter Karamarkos Anklage gegen ihn: “das Gericht könnte auch, statt einer Geldstrafe, ein Verbot für mich in der Verbreitung von Informationen durchsetzen. Das würde verhindern, dass ich jede Art von Journalistischer Tätigkeit ausüben könnte, sei es auf meinem Blog oder in anderen Medien.” Damit sei auch seinem Bemühen, den Fall Milan Levar aufzuklären, ein Ende gesetzt.

Reporter ohne Grenzen verurteilt die Anklage gegen Peratovic. “Es scheint, als ob das Einmischen der Medien in Kriegsverbrecherprozesse nicht willkommen ist zu einer Zeit, in der Kroatien um den Beitritt in die Europäische Union bemüht ist, so Rubina Möhring.”Der Innenminister sollte engagiert sein, die Untersuchungen um den Mord an einem geschützten Zeugen zu unterstützen statt diejenigen zu attackieren, die sich weigern, Kriegsverbrechen zu vergessen und unbestraft zu lassen”, führt sie fort.

Die Bestrafung unter Artikel 322/1 sei lächerlich und nicht akzeptabel, so die Organisation: “Das Verbrechen, Informationen zu verbreiten, die die Öffentlichkeit aufregen könnten, zeugt von einer obsoleten Ansicht über freie Meinungsäußerung, die völlig inkompatibel ist mit den demokratischen Standards der EU.”Diesen muss sich Kroatien aber anpassen, wenn es der EU beitreten will.”

“Wenn die Anklage gegen Peratovic länger andauert werden wir dafür sorgen, dass jede Anhörung vor Gericht bei offenen Türen stattfindet,” so die Organisation.

Zeljko Peratovic, der 2008 Todesdrohungen bekommen hatte, wurde schon 2007 verhaftet,unter anderem  weil er Staatsgeheimnisse über Kriegsverbrechen in den 1990ern auf seinem Blog veröffenlicht hatte.  Er arbeitete für verschiedene Zeitungen, zuletzt für “Vjesnik“. 2003 bekam er von Reporter ohne Grenzen Österreich den Press Freedom Award.

ROG, 19.01.09 12:19

  • Share/Bookmark

Legal lack of rights more dangerous than the illegal one

Sunday, January 11th, 2009

Legal lack of rights more dangerous than the illegal one

The situation is much more dangerous than I anticipated: some entirely impermissible actions in Croatia are not illegal but completely legal.

Violation of human and professional rights caused by the breach of law is definitely dangerous. However, the system has in-built mechanisms that are used to resist that and prosecute perpetrators. Violation of human and professional rights that is in accordance with the law is much more dangerous since it is an indicator that the system has in-built mechanisms that are favourable to such behaviour. It is similar to Stalin’s Soviet Union which had one of the most liberal constitutions in the world but, according to it, it was not illegal to put people, mostly communists, into concentration camps nor was it against the law to lock people up, primarily smarter ones, in mental hospitals.

Peratović case: Council for Civil Supervision of Security –Intelligence agencies held the opinion that, pursuant to Article 113 of the Act on Security and Intelligence system of the Republic of Croatia, it is entirely legal to detain and harass a citizen who is in this case a journalist. It is also legal to seize his work tools, such as computers with saved archives, and keep them for a longer period, suspect him of revealing state and military secrets without any foundation, and, in accordance with the above mentioned, it is utterly unfounded to doubt that his basic human and professional rights were violated by the above described procedures.  Consequently, working independently and keeping your own archive and using it in Croatia is not regarded as basic human and professional rights if civil servants do not like what you do or how you do it. 

Violation of  human and professional rights that is in accordance with the law is very dangerous since it is an indicator that the system has in-built mechanisms that are favourable to such a behaviour

 

The matter in case is the petition of Željko Peratović, an investigative journalist, which he submitted to the Council for Civil Supervision of Security –Intelligence agencies and the parliamentary Board for Internal Politics and National Security. In the petition, he asked for the protection of his human and professional rights. However, the petition, as we have seen, was rejected. 

As Freedom House reported, Peratović’s detention, together with breaking into Gordan Malić’s apartment and death threats directed at Robert Valdec, was mentioned as the reason why Croatia was placed at the 78th place of the world chart of media freedom. It should be also mentioned that the Croatian journalists’ association supported its member’s petition. The HND say that from the alleged SOA document which was released follows that the SOA was incriminating Peratović for his writing. 

Željko Peratović was professionally investigating the murder of Milan Levar, a witness to war crimes, and the obstruction of the investigation of Levar’s murderers for which he suspected the members of security-intelligence system.

Moreover, the non-denied analysis conducted by the SOA which dealt with Peratović’s work was released and it confirmed that the SOA “was decreasing damage” by infiltrating into the media space, making comments on blogs and other Internet pages.  

Naturally, it would not be for the first time that some state secret service was spreading (mis)information – it is also happening in Italy where the military espionage had a special department whose purpose was to misinform and slander – but that certainly is not the purpose for which citizens finance the service. In a decent world, it would be a shame and not the reason for earning salary and deserving a medal.

Pukanić case: The police, its internal control and one parliamentary board found that there was nothing illegal in preventing a citizen from informing journalists about something by using force, including handcuffs. The same citizen was then taken to a psychiatric hospital, where she does not belong in terms of the place of residence. The usual doctor’s procedure or any medical basis (as it was established by the follow-up specialist check-up) were lacking. The citizen was kept there under coercion for days.

This is naturally the case of Mirjana Pukanić.

The question is what her destiny would be like if the Croatian Helsinki Committee, a non-government organization, did not get involved. Unlike it, state authorities, as we have heard, were acting in accordance with the law.

The freedom of media is naturally the main goal of those legal but impermissible procedures but it is not the main victim. What is more endangered is civil freedom itself. If we are to believe the authorities that say that the law in Croatia enables and justifies pressures and threats to freedom that Željko Peratović and Mirjana Pukanić suffered – then it means that any of you, ladies and gentlemen, who voted for those who passed such laws and who pay taxes in order to finance all of that, can legally find himself in the same situation.

Inoslav Besker photo

Inoslav Bešker, RIMOVANJE, Jutarnji.hr, 14 May 2008

  • Share/Bookmark

Karamarko, protector of this and that

Sunday, January 11th, 2009

Karamarko sues journalist Peratović for accusations of protecting his friend’s killers

Karamarko against Peratovic

Tomislav Karamarko, the Croatian Minister of Internal Affairs, filed a suit against two independent Internet journalists- Željko Peratović and Domagoj Margetić. According to Veljko Miljević, Karamarko’s lawyer, the suit was filed for spreading disturbing and false contents. 

Karamarko filed his first suit at the Municipal Criminal Court in June when he was the head of the Security Intelligence Agency. Yet, the General Attorney’s Office considered that at that moment there were no grounds for criminal prosecution. At the beginning of December, his lawyer made an addition to the suit and put everything into motion once again. Miljević explains that he did not want to file a private suit against Peratović (authorities will prosecute him, author’s comment) because it is not only Karamarko whose dignity has been damaged but people close to him as well since he fills the post of minister at the moment.

“Karamarko, protector of this and that”

When asked to name at least two examples explaining why Karamarko decided to insist upon the suit, despite the atmosphere caused by the police prosecution of a Facebooker, Miljević says:

 ”As a man, Karamarko feels most hurt by Peratović claiming that he has covered up Milan Levar’s murderer. He says that his daughter asked him one day what murderers he was protecting», says Miljević. «Secondly, there are all sorts of articles on his blog – ‘Stjepan Mesić, the President of the Republic, this’, ‘State General Attorney Mladen Bajić that’, ‘the head of SOA, Tomislav Karamarko, protector of this and that’», enumerates Miljević.

He also added that it was not only the question of the Internet but he repeated the same on television, radio and printed media. Moreover, he claimed that Karamarko would not insist on the suit if the articles were not on the Internet for a longer period of time. 

For heaven’s sake, who killed Milan Levar?

Milan Levar was Peratović’s friend and the witness to war crimes in Gospić. He was also involved in the investigation regarding “Medački džep ‘93″, about which he was supposed to testify in The Hague. Levar claimed that Croatian secret service agencies had the right data and evidence of crimes. Levar pointed to general Mirko Norac and Tihomir Orešković, the secretary of the Lika Crisis Headquarters, as the chief suspects.  

Margetic and Miljevic

Domagoj Margetić and Karamarko’s lawyer Veljko Miljević

They were convicted but lead an easy life in prison – every now and then, Orešković’s serve time is suspended, while Norac managed to meet the love of his life, conceive a child and get married at the same time while serving a sentence for the killings of Serbs. Following Levar’s murder in 2000, media reported how Josip Manolić, who coordinated the work of Croatian secret service agencies at the time of those unfortunate events in Gospić, when asked to say who killed Levar, answered:

“Well, those he named war criminals! At least, that is clear!”

Thus, a former secret agent indirectly pointed to this duo. It is important to mention that Karamarko is not the only (now former, author’s comment) head of the intelligence agency that Peratović has been in conflict with since his friend was murdered.

Secret service raided “paranoid” Peratović’s apartment

Murderers have remained unknown until today. For years, Peratović has been unable to find a job in «proper» media because, in journalists’ circles, he is perceived as a paranoiac obsessed by secret services. He was not present in the media until he was arrested for revealing a military secret on the blog. His entire documentation and all computers in the apartment were seized.

The search was requested on the basis of notes from the Security Intelligence Agency (SOA) official letter, the office of the director Tomislav Karamarko from 17 September 2007. The search warrant, as said in the statement of reasons, was issued at the request of the Zagreb Police Department dated 16 October this year, the Ministry of Internal Affairs notes from 7 February, computer excerpts from Peratović’s blog.

Ana Benačić, Index.hr, 15.12.2008

  • Share/Bookmark

Rights in labour relation

Saturday, September 10th, 2005
Vjesnik Ltd.
Slavonska avenija 4
10 000 Zagreb
att: President of the board
Franjo Maletic, jur.

Employee: Zeljko Peratovic from Zagreb, III Pile 25

DEMAND FOR PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN LABOUR RELATION

Dear Sirs,

On the day 16th of August 2005. I received the Resolution of Management of Irregular dismissal of working contract. I suggest that you put out of order this Resolution of Management from 4th August, because most of the contents in Explanation of it is not according to the facts.

Conected with Your opening remark that I was in 2002. warned from former Management that I didn’t fulfill obligations in accordance with Regulations of work, I must remind You that I in Declaration to Employment council from 28th July, and in declaration to You from 3th August, said that in the very misunderstanding with editorial office at that time, the best informations could be heard from at that time chief editor of Vjesnik, Kresimir Fijacko, and his deputy, Miroslav Lezaja.
Colleague Lezaja, on the news that Management wants to give me dismissal, among others, guiding by Warning from 2002., said that he is personally ready testify that was misunderstanding, after my cooperation with editorial office got better on mutual benefit.

Anyway, at that time third man of editorial office, executive editor, Zlatko Herljevic, suggested several of my texts from Vjesnik in 2003., about Gotovina affair, for award Marija Juric Zagorka, in subcategory for investigative journalism.
Some of the texts that I have published in 2002. in Vjesnik, were rewarded from Reporters without borders of Austria, by award Press Freedom Award 2003.
So I suggest once more to, from former editorial stuff, try to find out directly what kind of worker I was.

It is true that in Feral Tribune on 22 July 2005. was published big interview with Pavle Gazi, which I signed, and that I didn’t have written approval for that.
Also, I must remind, that in my declarations to Empolyment council from 28 July and to You, as a President of the board since 3 August, I have pointed out all circumstances how it came to that I have behaved contrary to Working contract.
I consider that in those declarations, wishing to clear misunderstandings, cleared enough circumstances because of which I made mistakes, and the copies of the same I send to you again.

From your Explanation I don’t see that you during making decision about my Irregular dismissal, consulted my declarations at all, and that you even give untruth states that I have denied to defense myself.

The truth is that I couldn’t come on conversation with Mr Ivica Kriletic in Juridicial service on 1 August, because I was on sick leave, what he knew personally, because he, from hands of my brother, Mladen Peratovic, got doctor’s note of excuse. Also, at that time, my doctor recomended me avoiding contacts with stress factors, and my medical condition was in great part result of mobbing which I have experienced in editorial office, so my brother instead of me gave the note of excuse.

Ms. Gordana Tintor

My defense I gave to Employment council (Working council) in written form on 28 July, my witness for that was colleague Gordana Tintor from the council. She asked from me, in front of council, to give special declaration also to You, what I have done in written form on 3 August and have sent by fax.

So, it is not truth the state in Explanation that I have defaulted on call to give my defense, what except colleague Tintor, can also confirm other witnesses.
Considering that this kind of Irregular dismissal can be interpreted as finish of process of mobbing, which was done towards me in time of this Management and former chief editor, Andrea Latinovic, latest since September 2004. till now, I suggest to put this resolution out of order.

The editor Marijana Matkovic, whom on 22 July I informed about serious death threats, which I reported to police the same day, told me that Management and editorial office got for perusal my Suggestion of settlement to State attorney’s office of Croatia, connected with POA case. She didn’t pay attention on the fact that I got death threats, but she pointed out that in Management and editorial office were very furious with me when they saw that I have in Suggestion of settlement described mobbing in Vjesnik, and that after that interview in Feral I would get Irregular dismissal for sure.

This is another proof which would go in favour of thesis that my dismissal in Vjesnik was preparing earlier than I made a mistake with interview in Feral.
Moreover, I don’t have the information whether Management was legaly informed about the contents of my Suggestion of settlement and what was said about the contents which were related to Vjesnik.

Because of all this mentioned, I suggest to the Management to examine once more the resolution about Irregular dismissal and to put it out of order.

In Zagreb, 29th August 2005.

employee

Zeljko Peratovic

Enclosures:
1. Declaration to President of the Board from 3th August
2. Declaration to Employment council of Vjesnik P Ltd. from 28th July
3. Vjesnik’s printout of working version of text about murder of Stjepan Djurekovic from 11th July, which was ordered, but without explanation, not published

  • Share/Bookmark

Franjo Maletic – Vjesnik

Saturday, September 10th, 2005
Vjesnik Ltd.
Slavonska avenija 4
10 000 Zagreb

President of the board:
FRANJO MALETIC
Telephone: 61 61 700
Fax: 36 41 606

Franjo Maletic

Dear Sir,

I, Zeljko Peratovic, beneath signed journalist of column Croatia in daily newspapers Vjesnik, on recommendation of Employment council of Vjesnik Ltd., submit to you declaration about your Suggestion from 25 July 2005. to give me Irregular dismissal of working contract because of heavy violation of working duty, and which on 28 July 2005. I submited to Employment council on its demand.

On that date, when I have sent an official letter to the Council, I was told that Management would be informed about that.
However, the next day, on 29 July 2005. I got a phone call from Mr Kriletic from Vjesnik’s management office to come and collect my dismissal letter. I told him that I couldn’t because I was in surgery, because of previous mobbing in editorial office, death threats from Switzerland which I reported to police, and about what Novi list was writing, death of my mother, and notice that I would be dismissed, I got sick.

Mr Kriletic told me to come to see him on 1st August of this year in 9:00. I answered that I would do that if I could.
On specialist check up on 30 July 2005. on xxx xxx, in xxx xxx, my status of sick leave from 29 July of this year opened in surgery of dr. xxx xxx, and strictly confirmed in diagnosis to cure myself at home with family and that I must keep away from all stress situations. Among others, stress situations are above described my position in Vjesnik’s office. All this you can check by the mentioned doctors, that is institutions, and medical file I can’t submit to you, because it is considered as medical secret.

Considering that Employment council didn’t find necessary to inform you about mentioned declaration, I will do that personally, no matter further steps of Management, connected with announcement that I will get Irregular dismissal of working contract.

Best regards,

Journalist

Zeljko Peratovic

In Zagreb, 3 August 2005

  • Share/Bookmark

Irregular dismissal – Vjesnik

Saturday, September 10th, 2005
Employment council of Vjesnik Ltd.
Zagreb,28 July 2005
Subject: Declaration about Resolution of Management of Vjesnik Ltd. from 25 July this year to give to journalist Zeljko Peratovic Irregular dismissal of working contract because of heavy violation of working duty
Dear Sir,

I, beneath signed journalist of internal politics editorial office of Vjesnik, Zeljko Peratovic, in this way, want to explain my point of view of circumstances which Management gives as a reason to give me Irregular dismissal of working contract.

The interview with Pavle Gazi, socialistic Minister of police in Socialistic Republic of Croatia (1982./1983.) published in weekly magazine Feral Tribune nr. 1035, under title Djurekovic is killed outside of protocol, I consider as my work of authorship (that’s why it is not under pseudonym). Since 1983. till today Mr Gazi gave only two interviews, both to me. One for Fokus in 2000., and another could be published in Vjesnik, if editorial office wanted that.

I made the interview on my own expense, travelling on non-working day, by friend’s car in Koprivnica, where Mr Gazi lives, taking photos with my own camera, using my own film, and paying for the photographs. At the same time, the interview is written and sent to editorial office of Feral out of working hours in Vjesnik.

By this I want to say that I don’t think that I, by any material means, damaged Vjesnik by publishing Gazi’s interview in magazine Feral Tribune.

I addmit that I have violated the term of working contract, which says that it is allowed to the journalists of Vjesnik to cooperate with other medias exclusively with consent of employer, that is editorial office.

Editor Zoran Vodopija

Considering the importance of theme which Mr Gazi was talking about, and the fact that I have previously talked with him about murder of Stjepan Djurekovic for Vjesnik (enclosure 1.) by previous agreement with chief editor, Andrea Latinovic, editor Zoran Vodopija, editor Nada Dmitrovic and assisstant of director for editorial office, dr. Goran Popovic, and as that arranged conversation for Vjesnik wasn’t done, and I got no explanation from mentioned people, and asked for it from dr. Popovic and editor Dmitrovic, leading the principle of freedom of reporting, and also law regulations which forbid censorship, extended conversation from Vjesnik, made on my expense, I published in Feral Tribune.

The text for Vjesnik was written on 11 July 2005. in 14:54, and chief editor took a look at it in 15:14 and by words of editor Nada Dmitrovic, forbided its publishing without any explanation.
I was ready, in accordance with higher professional standards or new Vjesnik’s general editorial approach, remodel mentioned text, write new, or make for Vjesnik only interview with Pavle Gazi, about I have talked on 12 July 2005 with assisstant of director for editorial office, dr. Goran Popovic.

He promised me that he would talk with chief editor Andrea Latinovic, connected with this problem, and that I would be informed about everything on time.

By the way, I told him about series of problems that I had in communication with at that days chief editor, starting with September 2005, when she accused me publicly that on my text were coming complaints and to the director Franjo Maletic. About these complaints to dr. Popovic you can find out more in one part of my Suggestion to State attorney’s office of Croatia for peaceful settlement of dispute, connected with result of violation of human rights, which I experienced from Counterintelligence agency, and what was officialy recognised byCouncil for internal politics and national security of Croatian Parliament (enclosure 2.).

I informed dr. Popovic that I, because of mobbing which I was exposed to by at that time chief editor Andrea Latinovic, was forced to be two months on sick leave, that was, psychiatric medical treatment, in May and June of this year.
It was medicaly proved, and that can confirm also my doctor, that journalist profession is specific, and that censorship and mobbing, that is, impossibility of writing and publishing, can cause serious mental damages.

So, as at that days chief editor or assisstant of director, and other editors, couldn’t explain what would happen with my text about murder of Stjepan Djurekovic, which exactly today gets great international dimension, I thought that on written approval to that, or expanded text on the same theme, to publish somewhere else, I might wait or till death of Mr Gazi or probably till change of whole editorial management and structure of Vjesnik, or God save, till closing the newspapers, and what I thought was contrary to all journalist principals of in due time and truthful reporting.
Rikard Pompe (left) and Zlatko Herljevic (right) with orphans

Conected with complaint that I in 2002. also got warning about possible Irregular dismissal of working contract from at that time director Rikard Pompe, I ask from Employment council to ask fo opinion about that at that time chief editor Kresimir Fijacko, his deputy Miroslav Lezaja, and executive editor Zlatko Herljevic, who in 2003 propose me in name of Vjesnik’s branch in Croatian journalist association for its award for investigative journalism. Reporters without borders of Austria awarded me with international award for investigative journalism Press Freedom – Signal für Europa 2003, partly thanks to texts published exactly in Vjesnik.

Best regards,

Zeljko Peratovic

  • Share/Bookmark