Archive for the ‘legal actions’ Category

Les poursuites juridiques lencontre de Zeljko Peratovic toujours infondes

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE

13 mai 2009

Croatie

Les poursuites juridiques lencontre de Zeljko Peratovic toujours infondes

_____

Activists from the Paris-based press freedom group Reporters Without Borders, Robert Menard, left, Vincent Brossel, center, and Jean-Francois Julliard, right

Activists from the Paris-based press freedom group Reporters Without Borders, Robert Menard, left, Vincent Brossel, center, and Jean-Francois Julliard, right

________________________________________________________________

Reporters sans frontires dnonce le maintien des poursuites ouvertes le 14 janvier 2008 lencontre du journaliste Zeljko Peratovic, la demande du ministre de lIntrieur Tomislav Karamarko, qui laccuse davoir contrevenu larticle 322/1 KZA du code pnal prescrivant une peine de prison dun an et des amendes pour toute personne qui diffuserait des informations de nature inquiter la population .

Le ministre de l’Intrieur avait dj t auditionn une premire fois lissue de quoi il stait avr incapable d’apporter la preuve que les lments juridiques du dlit taient runis. En convoquant le 11 mai 2009 Tomislav Karamarko pour une seconde audition, la juge lui donnait une nouvelle occasion de dfendre sa position l’aide de tmoins membres de son entourage proche. En vain.

Il est dsormais plus que temps de clturer ce dossier qui ne repose sur aucun fondement. Les poursuites tablies sur la base de larticle 322/1 sont inconsistantes et irrecevables. La notion dinformation de nature inquiter la population constitue une vision obsolte de la libert dexpression , a dclar Reporters sans frontires.

Malgr lopportunit ouverte par cette seconde audition, le ministre na manifestement toujours pas les moyens de prouver le bien-fond de ses accusations. Les liens de Tomislav Karamarko avec les tmoins cits rsument bien toute la partialit des poursuites engages. Le public inquit par les informations publies par Zeljko Peratovic peut-il tre raisonnablement rduit cinq personnes, membres de la famille du ministre ou anciens collaborateurs du service des renseignements quil dirigeait auparavant? , a ajout lorganisation.

Nous demandons aux autorits judiciaires en charge du dossier dannuler toutes les poursuites ouvertes lencontre de Zeljko Peratovic , a conclu Jean-Franois Julliard, secrtaire gnral de Reporters sans frontires.

Sur ses blogs (peratovic.net et peratovic.blog.hr), Zeljko Peratovic a dnonc lobstruction pratique par Tomislav Karamarko dans lenqute sur la mort de Milan Levar, un tmoin protg du Tribunal pnal international pour lex-Yougoslavie (TPIY) dcd dans lexplosion de sa voiture, le 28 aot 2000 Gospic.

47, rue Vivienne – 75002 Paris (France)

Tel : 33 1 44 83 84 67 Fax : 33 1 45 23 11 51

rsf_eu@rsf.org – Plus d’informations www.rsf.org

Interior minister fails again to support charges against journalist

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

PRESS RELEASE

13 may 2009

Croatia

Interior minister fails again to support charges against journalist

_____________________________________________________________________

Reporters Without Borders condemns a court decision to continue investigating the charge of disseminating information likely to upset the population under article 322/1 of the criminal code that was brought against journalist Zeljko Peratovic in January at the behest at interior minister Tomislav Karamarko. It carries a maximum sentence of a year in prison as well as a possible fine.

Karamarko initiated the case against Peratovic because of allegations he made in two blogs, peratovic.net and peratovic.blog.hr, accusing Karamarko of obstructing the investigation into the death of Milan Levar, a witness under the protection of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), who was killed by a car bomb in Gospic in August 2000.

Karamarko failed to produce any legally sound evidence against Peratovic when he was initially questioned in court. A second hearing was held in the case on 11 May at which the minister was given another chance. He brought several aides and close associates along to testify but he again failed to support the charge.

It is high time to close this case, which has no foundation, Reporters Without Borders said. The charges under article 322/1 are inconsistent and should be dismissed. The very concept of information likely to upset the population is based on an obsolete idea of free expression.

Despite being given another opportunity at this second hearing, the interior minister still clearly lacks the means to support his allegations. His ties to those who were summoned to testify highlight the lack of impartiality in this case. Is the population that is supposedly upset by Peratovics information limited to these five people, all relatives of the minister or members of the intelligence agency he used to head?

Reporters Without Borders added: We urge the judicial authorities in charge of this case to dismiss all the charges against Peratovic.

Judicial harassment of war crimes reporter continues

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

Judicial harassment of war crimes reporter continues

Croatia, 15. 01. 2009

Reporters Without Borders condemns the charge that was brought yesterday at the behest at interior minister Tomislav Karamarko against a journalist who writes about war crimes in the 1990s. Zeljko Peratovic is accused of disseminating information likely to upset the population under article 322/1 KZA of the criminal code, which carries a maximum sentence of a year in prison as well as a possible fine.

In blog entries (peratovic.net and peratovic.blog.hr), letters to national judicial officials and a series of public statements, Peratovic has accused the interior minister of obstructing the investigation into the death of Milan Levar, a witness under the protection of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), who was killed by a car bomb in the southeastern village of Gospic in August 2000.

Peratovic was questioned as a witness in the course of the investigation because he was one of the last people to see Levar alive. The prosecutor in charge of the investigation subsequently identified Peratovic as a witness, in violation of judicial confidentiality.

Interior minister Karamarko portrays himself as the victim of defamation and claims that I want to upset the population, but he is pursuing a different objective Peratovic said. As well as fining me, the court could above all decide to ban me from disseminating information for an indefinite period. That would prevent be from undertaking any kind of journalistic activity, on my blog or in other media.

Peratovic added : It would also prevent me from continuing my effort to discover who was behind Milan Levars murder. Some people are counting on the statute of limitations eventually applying to this case. Silencing me could be a way of achieving this.

Reporters Without Borders said : It seems that press investigations into war crimes are not welcome at a time when Croatia is trying to join the European Union. The interior minister should be trying to help the investigation into a protected witnesss murder rather than attacking those who refuse to let war crimes be forgotten and go unpunished.

The prosecution being brought against Peratovic under article 322/1 is ridiculous and unacceptable, the press freedom organisation continued. The crime of information likely to upset the population reflects on obsolete view of freedom of expression that is incompatible with the European democratic standards that Croatia will have to conform to if it wants to join the EU.

Reporters Without Borders added : If the prosecution of Peratovic goes ahead, we insist that whenever any of the parties are questioned in court, it no longer takes place behind closed doors.

Zeljko Peratovic, who received death threats in 2008 in the form of comments added to his blog, was arrested at his home on 17 October 2007 on a charge of revealing state secret for posting documents on his blog relating to war crimes in Gospic in the 1990s, and for referring to the existence of a video of witness accusing former defence minister Gojko Susak (now deceased) and a parliamentary deputy president (Darko Milinovic, now croatian minister of th health and new vice president of HDZ, op. 45 lines) of involvement.

Aged 42, he faced a possible three-year prison sentence. In the event, the prosecution was not pursued but the charges have not been withdrawn and the files confiscated by the police have still not been returned to him.

Peratovic has worked for various newspapers, the latest of which is Vjesnik. His investigations into war crimes have earned him a lot of trouble. He has been fired, he has been physically attacked and he is regarded as a traitor by many of his compatriots, who refuse outright to consider the possibility that Croatians may have committed war crimes.

He received the received the press freedom prize of the Reporters Without Borders Austrian section in 2003.

RSF, Publi le 15 janvier 2009

Kroatischer Journalist Zeljko Peratovic von Innenminister verklagt

Monday, January 26th, 2009

Kroatischer Journalist Zeljko Peratovic von Innenminister verklagt

Der kroatische Journalist Zeljko Peratovic, bekannt fr seine Berichte ber Kriegsverbrechen im ehemaligen Jugoslawien whrend der 1990er Jahre, ist vom kroatischen Innenminister Tomislav Karamarko angeklagt worden. Er wird beschuldigt, Informationen verffentlicht zu haben, die “zu Aufregung in der Bevlkerung” fhren knnte, so die Anklage, die sich nach Artikel 322/1 KZA des Strafgesetzes richtet und maximal ein Jahr Gefngnis sowie eine mgliche Geldstrafe beinhaltet.

Peratovic hatte in seinen Blogeintrgen (peratovic.net und peratovic.blog.hr) Briefe an nationale Justizbeamte sowie eine Reihe von ffentlichen Statements publiziert. Er beschuldigte darin den Innenminister, die Untersuchungen zum Tod des Zeugen vor dem Internationalen Tribunal fr Kriegsverbrecher im ehemaligen Jugoslawien, Milan Levar, zu behindern. Levar wurde im Jahr 2000 Opfer eines Autobombenattentats.

Peratovic, einer der letzten, die Levar lebend gesehen hatten, wurde als Zeuge in Ermittlungen um den Anschlag befragt. Der Journalist vermutet eine bestimmte Absicht hinter Karamarkos Anklage gegen ihn: “das Gericht knnte auch, statt einer Geldstrafe, ein Verbot fr mich in der Verbreitung von Informationen durchsetzen. Das wrde verhindern, dass ich jede Art von Journalistischer Ttigkeit ausben knnte, sei es auf meinem Blog oder in anderen Medien.” Damit sei auch seinem Bemhen, den Fall Milan Levar aufzuklren, ein Ende gesetzt.

Reporter ohne Grenzen verurteilt die Anklage gegen Peratovic. “Es scheint, als ob das Einmischen der Medien in Kriegsverbrecherprozesse nicht willkommen ist zu einer Zeit, in der Kroatien um den Beitritt in die Europische Union bemht ist, so Rubina Mhring.”Der Innenminister sollte engagiert sein, die Untersuchungen um den Mord an einem geschtzten Zeugen zu untersttzen statt diejenigen zu attackieren, die sich weigern, Kriegsverbrechen zu vergessen und unbestraft zu lassen”, fhrt sie fort.

Die Bestrafung unter Artikel 322/1 sei lcherlich und nicht akzeptabel, so die Organisation: “Das Verbrechen, Informationen zu verbreiten, die die ffentlichkeit aufregen knnten, zeugt von einer obsoleten Ansicht ber freie Meinungsuerung, die vllig inkompatibel ist mit den demokratischen Standards der EU.”Diesen muss sich Kroatien aber anpassen, wenn es der EU beitreten will.”

“Wenn die Anklage gegen Peratovic lnger andauert werden wir dafr sorgen, dass jede Anhrung vor Gericht bei offenen Tren stattfindet,” so die Organisation.

Zeljko Peratovic, der 2008 Todesdrohungen bekommen hatte, wurde schon 2007 verhaftet,unter anderem weil er Staatsgeheimnisse ber Kriegsverbrechen in den 1990ern auf seinem Blog verffenlicht hatte. Er arbeitete fr verschiedene Zeitungen, zuletzt fr “Vjesnik“. 2003 bekam er von Reporter ohne Grenzen sterreich den Press Freedom Award.

ROG, 19.01.09 12:19

Karamarko, protector of this and that

Sunday, January 11th, 2009

Karamarko sues journalist Peratović for accusations of protecting his friends killers

Karamarko against Peratovic

Tomislav Karamarko, the Croatian Minister of Internal Affairs, filed a suit against two independent Internet journalists- eljko Peratović and Domagoj Margetić. According to Veljko Miljević, Karamarko’s lawyer, the suit was filed for spreading disturbing and false contents.

Karamarko filed his first suit at the Municipal Criminal Court in June when he was the head of the Security Intelligence Agency. Yet, the General Attorney’s Office considered that at that moment there were no grounds for criminal prosecution. At the beginning of December, his lawyer made an addition to the suit and put everything into motion once again. Miljević explains that he did not want to file a private suit against Peratović (authorities will prosecute him, authors comment) because it is not only Karamarko whose dignity has been damaged but people close to him as well since he fills the post of minister at the moment.

“Karamarko, protector of this and that”

When asked to name at least two examples explaining why Karamarko decided to insist upon the suit, despite the atmosphere caused by the police prosecution of a Facebooker, Miljević says:

”As a man, Karamarko feels most hurt by Peratović claiming that he has covered up Milan Levar’s murderer. He says that his daughter asked him one day what murderers he was protecting, says Miljević. Secondly, there are all sorts of articles on his blog – ‘Stjepan Mesić, the President of the Republic, this’, ‘State General Attorney Mladen Bajić that’, ‘the head of SOA, Tomislav Karamarko, protector of this and that’, enumerates Miljević.

He also added that it was not only the question of the Internet but he repeated the same on television, radio and printed media. Moreover, he claimed that Karamarko would not insist on the suit if the articles were not on the Internet for a longer period of time.

For heaven’s sake, who killed Milan Levar?

Milan Levar was Peratović’s friend and the witness to war crimes in Gospić. He was also involved in the investigation regarding “Medački dep ‘93″, about which he was supposed to testify in The Hague. Levar claimed that Croatian secret service agencies had the right data and evidence of crimes. Levar pointed to general Mirko Norac and Tihomir Oreković, the secretary of the Lika Crisis Headquarters, as the chief suspects.

Margetic and Miljevic

Domagoj Margetić and Karamarko’s lawyer Veljko Miljević

They were convicted but lead an easy life in prison every now and then, Oreković’s serve time is suspended, while Norac managed to meet the love of his life, conceive a child and get married at the same time while serving a sentence for the killings of Serbs. Following Levar’s murder in 2000, media reported how Josip Manolić, who coordinated the work of Croatian secret service agencies at the time of those unfortunate events in Gospić, when asked to say who killed Levar, answered:

“Well, those he named war criminals! At least, that is clear!”

Thus, a former secret agent indirectly pointed to this duo. It is important to mention that Karamarko is not the only (now former, authors comment) head of the intelligence agency that Peratović has been in conflict with since his friend was murdered.

Secret service raided “paranoid” Peratović’s apartment

Murderers have remained unknown until today. For years, Peratović has been unable to find a job in proper media because, in journalists’ circles, he is perceived as a paranoiac obsessed by secret services. He was not present in the media until he was arrested for revealing a military secret on the blog. His entire documentation and all computers in the apartment were seized.

The search was requested on the basis of notes from the Security Intelligence Agency (SOA) official letter, the office of the director Tomislav Karamarko from 17 September 2007. The search warrant, as said in the statement of reasons, was issued at the request of the Zagreb Police Department dated 16 October this year, the Ministry of Internal Affairs notes from 7 February, computer excerpts from Peratović’s blog.

Ana Benačić, Index.hr, 15.12.2008

Vjesnik u crnim kronikama

Friday, June 16th, 2006

Kae odvjetnik Zvonimir Hodak da mu se javilo troje Vjesnikovih novinara, bivih urednika te da u njihovo ime priprema tubu protiv glavnog urednika Darka Đuretka za mobbing i seksualno uznemiravanje.

ZAGREB – U ime troje novinara Vjesnika, odvjetnički ured Zvonimira Hodaka priprema tube protiv Vjesnika i njegova glavnog urednika Darka Đuretka. Novine i glavnog urednika tui dvoje bivih glavnih urednika, Kreimir Fijačko i Andrea Latinović, te biva zamjenica glavnog urednika Marijana Mikainović Jambrović.

Njih će troje Vjesnik i Đureteka tuiti zbog ikaniranja na radnom mjestu i mobbinga, a A. Latinović i M. Mikainović protiv Đuretka će podnijeti jo i tubu zbog seksualnog uznemiravanja.

- Razlozi za tubu su to su raspoređeni na poslove koji ne odgovaraju njihovoj stručnoj spremi, a to je protivno Zakonu o radu. Svima su smanjene plaće, i to drastično. Sve mirii na revanizam jer su svi bili glavni urednici, odnosno zamjenica – kae odvjetnik Hodak, dodajući da mu se javilo jo nekoliko novinara iz Vjesnika koji također namjeravaju podići tube protiv Vjesnika i Đuretka, pa čak i pokrenuti kazneni postupak.
Ivanka Toma, Jutarnji list, 15.06.2006

Da je situacija u Vjesniku katastrofalna znam i sam. Prole godine su mi dali otkaz, a mobbingu sam bio izloen od strane Andreje Latinović i Marijane Mikainović Jambrović i Marijane Matković. Direktor Franjo Maletić razrijeio je moju dramu sa sadanjim tuiteljicama tako to je meni dao otkaz, a njih rasporedio na druge poslove. Naravno, nisam ja uzrokovao njihovu smjenu. Moje su predstavke bile samo povod. Izgubile su podrku vrha HDZ-a. Odnosno izgubila ju je je Andrea Latinović, koja se jo za vrijeme Kreimira Fijačka gurala na putovanja sa Sanaderom. Dirljivi su bili njeni SMS-ovi kolegama iz Vatikana kako je predsjednik Sanader poljubio ruku Svetom Ocu Papi.

Sjećam se da me Marijana Matković, trenutno raspoređena na rad u Gradsku rubriku, uvjeravala početkom 2004. da će Andreja Latinović naslijediti Fijačka jer da za nju kod Sanadera snano lobiraju Andrija Hebrang i Jadranka Kosor. Tako se i dogodilo. Fijačka su smijenili i bez javnog natječaja za glavnu urednicu imenovali Andreju Latinović. Ona je odmah izabrala svoj tim: zamjenicu Marijanu Mikainović, dugogodinju Vjesnikovu redaktoricu, pomoćnicu Marijanu Matković, novinarku specijaliziranu za socijalu, pomoćnika Zorana Vodopiju, biveg diplomata i vanjskopolitičkog novinara…

Oni su bili kadar HDZ-a. Postavio ih je direktor Franjo Maletić kojeg je Sanader poslao u Vjesnik. Smijenio ih je isti Maletić, a nikada se nisu alili da su smijenjeni iz političkih razloga. Pa to sada hoće?
U vrijeme kad sam ja maltretiran od te uprave i uredniotva na mobbing se alila i pokojna Vjesnikova dopisnica Snjeana Čanić Divić, koja je od posljedica pritisaka na poslu i preminula ove godine. Njen otac mi je najavio tubu protiv Vjesnika, ali i urednitva iz vremena kada su počeli pritisci na Snjeanu.

Nekako mi se čini da su tube obitelji Čanić protiv Vjesnika i moje daleko ozbiljnije za te novine i neke od spomenutih urednica, nego to postoji mogućnost da Hodakovi klijenti uopće podnesu tubu.

Naime, oni se nadaju da će se vijeću iz Jutarnjeg uplaiti direktor Maletić i Đuretek, pa im povećati plaće. Ako prođe, prođe… Uostalom, kakve su to ozbiljne tube kad odvjetnik zapravo i nezna za to bi konkretno optuio.

vidi jo:

Nesuđeni veleposlanik RH u vicarskoj Zoran Vodopija preuzeo uređivanje Crne kronike u Vjesniku

OSCE Croatia – Vjesnik

Kako sam se uzaludno očitovao Zaposleničkom vijeću Vjesnika

Izvanredni otkaz u Vjesniku (Why I will be fired from Vjesnik)

Otila Andrea Latinović (u Partnerstvo za drutveni razvoj, HT, MVP?)

Rights in labour relation

Irregular dismissal – Vjesnik

Laudatio auf Zeljko Peratovic

To Mladen Bajic

Homeland Calling from Australia

Novinarstvo (mobbing) ubija – U spomen kolegici Snjeani Čanić Divić

Rights in labour relation

Saturday, September 10th, 2005
Vjesnik Ltd.
Slavonska avenija 4
10 000 Zagreb
att: President of the board
Franjo Maletic, jur.

Employee: Zeljko Peratovic from Zagreb, III Pile 25

DEMAND FOR PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN LABOUR RELATION

Dear Sirs,

On the day 16th of August 2005. I received the Resolution of Management of Irregular dismissal of working contract. I suggest that you put out of order this Resolution of Management from 4th August, because most of the contents in Explanation of it is not according to the facts.

Conected with Your opening remark that I was in 2002. warned from former Management that I didn’t fulfill obligations in accordance with Regulations of work, I must remind You that I in Declaration to Employment council from 28th July, and in declaration to You from 3th August, said that in the very misunderstanding with editorial office at that time, the best informations could be heard from at that time chief editor of Vjesnik, Kresimir Fijacko, and his deputy, Miroslav Lezaja.
Colleague Lezaja, on the news that Management wants to give me dismissal, among others, guiding by Warning from 2002., said that he is personally ready testify that was misunderstanding, after my cooperation with editorial office got better on mutual benefit.

Anyway, at that time third man of editorial office, executive editor, Zlatko Herljevic, suggested several of my texts from Vjesnik in 2003., about Gotovina affair, for award Marija Juric Zagorka, in subcategory for investigative journalism.
Some of the texts that I have published in 2002. in Vjesnik, were rewarded from Reporters without borders of Austria, by award Press Freedom Award 2003.
So I suggest once more to, from former editorial stuff, try to find out directly what kind of worker I was.

It is true that in Feral Tribune on 22 July 2005. was published big interview with Pavle Gazi, which I signed, and that I didn’t have written approval for that.
Also, I must remind, that in my declarations to Empolyment council from 28 July and to You, as a President of the board since 3 August, I have pointed out all circumstances how it came to that I have behaved contrary to Working contract.
I consider that in those declarations, wishing to clear misunderstandings, cleared enough circumstances because of which I made mistakes, and the copies of the same I send to you again.

From your Explanation I don’t see that you during making decision about my Irregular dismissal, consulted my declarations at all, and that you even give untruth states that I have denied to defense myself.

The truth is that I couldn’t come on conversation with Mr Ivica Kriletic in Juridicial service on 1 August, because I was on sick leave, what he knew personally, because he, from hands of my brother, Mladen Peratovic, got doctor’s note of excuse. Also, at that time, my doctor recomended me avoiding contacts with stress factors, and my medical condition was in great part result of mobbing which I have experienced in editorial office, so my brother instead of me gave the note of excuse.

Ms. Gordana Tintor

My defense I gave to Employment council (Working council) in written form on 28 July, my witness for that was colleague Gordana Tintor from the council. She asked from me, in front of council, to give special declaration also to You, what I have done in written form on 3 August and have sent by fax.

So, it is not truth the state in Explanation that I have defaulted on call to give my defense, what except colleague Tintor, can also confirm other witnesses.
Considering that this kind of Irregular dismissal can be interpreted as finish of process of mobbing, which was done towards me in time of this Management and former chief editor, Andrea Latinovic, latest since September 2004. till now, I suggest to put this resolution out of order.

The editor Marijana Matkovic, whom on 22 July I informed about serious death threats, which I reported to police the same day, told me that Management and editorial office got for perusal my Suggestion of settlement to State attorney’s office of Croatia, connected with POA case. She didn’t pay attention on the fact that I got death threats, but she pointed out that in Management and editorial office were very furious with me when they saw that I have in Suggestion of settlement described mobbing in Vjesnik, and that after that interview in Feral I would get Irregular dismissal for sure.

This is another proof which would go in favour of thesis that my dismissal in Vjesnik was preparing earlier than I made a mistake with interview in Feral.
Moreover, I don’t have the information whether Management was legaly informed about the contents of my Suggestion of settlement and what was said about the contents which were related to Vjesnik.

Because of all this mentioned, I suggest to the Management to examine once more the resolution about Irregular dismissal and to put it out of order.

In Zagreb, 29th August 2005.

employee

Zeljko Peratovic

Enclosures:
1. Declaration to President of the Board from 3th August
2. Declaration to Employment council of Vjesnik P Ltd. from 28th July
3. Vjesnik’s printout of working version of text about murder of Stjepan Djurekovic from 11th July, which was ordered, but without explanation, not published

Rights in labour relation

Saturday, September 10th, 2005
Vjesnik Ltd.
Slavonska avenija 4
10 000 Zagreb
att: President of the board
Franjo Maletic, jur.

Employee: Zeljko Peratovic from Zagreb, III Pile 25

DEMAND FOR PROTECTION OF RIGHTS IN LABOUR RELATION

Dear Sirs,

On the day 16th of August 2005. I received the Resolution of Management of Irregular dismissal of working contract. I suggest that you put out of order this Resolution of Management from 4th August, because most of the contents in Explanation of it is not according to the facts.

Conected with Your opening remark that I was in 2002. warned from former Management that I didn’t fulfill obligations in accordance with Regulations of work, I must remind You that I in Declaration to Employment council from 28th July, and in declaration to You from 3th August, said that in the very misunderstanding with editorial office at that time, the best informations could be heard from at that time chief editor of Vjesnik, Kresimir Fijacko, and his deputy, Miroslav Lezaja.
Colleague Lezaja, on the news that Management wants to give me dismissal, among others, guiding by Warning from 2002., said that he is personally ready testify that was misunderstanding, after my cooperation with editorial office got better on mutual benefit.

Anyway, at that time third man of editorial office, executive editor, Zlatko Herljevic, suggested several of my texts from Vjesnik in 2003., about Gotovina affair, for award Marija Juric Zagorka, in subcategory for investigative journalism.
Some of the texts that I have published in 2002. in Vjesnik, were rewarded from Reporters without borders of Austria, by award Press Freedom Award 2003.
So I suggest once more to, from former editorial stuff, try to find out directly what kind of worker I was.

It is true that in Feral Tribune on 22 July 2005. was published big interview with Pavle Gazi, which I signed, and that I didn’t have written approval for that.
Also, I must remind, that in my declarations to Empolyment council from 28 July and to You, as a President of the board since 3 August, I have pointed out all circumstances how it came to that I have behaved contrary to Working contract.
I consider that in those declarations, wishing to clear misunderstandings, cleared enough circumstances because of which I made mistakes, and the copies of the same I send to you again.

From your Explanation I don’t see that you during making decision about my Irregular dismissal, consulted my declarations at all, and that you even give untruth states that I have denied to defense myself.

The truth is that I couldn’t come on conversation with Mr Ivica Kriletic in Juridicial service on 1 August, because I was on sick leave, what he knew personally, because he, from hands of my brother, Mladen Peratovic, got doctor’s note of excuse. Also, at that time, my doctor recomended me avoiding contacts with stress factors, and my medical condition was in great part result of mobbing which I have experienced in editorial office, so my brother instead of me gave the note of excuse.

Ms. Gordana Tintor

My defense I gave to Employment council (Working council) in written form on 28 July, my witness for that was colleague Gordana Tintor from the council. She asked from me, in front of council, to give special declaration also to You, what I have done in written form on 3 August and have sent by fax.

So, it is not truth the state in Explanation that I have defaulted on call to give my defense, what except colleague Tintor, can also confirm other witnesses.
Considering that this kind of Irregular dismissal can be interpreted as finish of process of mobbing, which was done towards me in time of this Management and former chief editor, Andrea Latinovic, latest since September 2004. till now, I suggest to put this resolution out of order.

The editor Marijana Matkovic, whom on 22 July I informed about serious death threats, which I reported to police the same day, told me that Management and editorial office got for perusal my Suggestion of settlement to State attorney’s office of Croatia, connected with POA case. She didn’t pay attention on the fact that I got death threats, but she pointed out that in Management and editorial office were very furious with me when they saw that I have in Suggestion of settlement described mobbing in Vjesnik, and that after that interview in Feral I would get Irregular dismissal for sure.

This is another proof which would go in favour of thesis that my dismissal in Vjesnik was preparing earlier than I made a mistake with interview in Feral.
Moreover, I don’t have the information whether Management was legaly informed about the contents of my Suggestion of settlement and what was said about the contents which were related to Vjesnik.

Because of all this mentioned, I suggest to the Management to examine once more the resolution about Irregular dismissal and to put it out of order.

In Zagreb, 29th August 2005.

employee

Zeljko Peratovic

Enclosures:
1. Declaration to President of the Board from 3th August
2. Declaration to Employment council of Vjesnik P Ltd. from 28th July
3. Vjesnik’s printout of working version of text about murder of Stjepan Djurekovic from 11th July, which was ordered, but without explanation, not published

Franjo Maletic – Vjesnik

Saturday, September 10th, 2005
Vjesnik Ltd.
Slavonska avenija 4
10 000 Zagreb

President of the board:
FRANJO MALETIC
Telephone: 61 61 700
Fax: 36 41 606

Franjo Maletic

Dear Sir,

I, Zeljko Peratovic, beneath signed journalist of column Croatia in daily newspapers Vjesnik, on recommendation of Employment council of Vjesnik Ltd., submit to you declaration about your Suggestion from 25 July 2005. to give me Irregular dismissal of working contract because of heavy violation of working duty, and which on 28 July 2005. I submited to Employment council on its demand.

On that date, when I have sent an official letter to the Council, I was told that Management would be informed about that.
However, the next day, on 29 July 2005. I got a phone call from Mr Kriletic from Vjesnik’s management office to come and collect my dismissal letter. I told him that I couldn’t because I was in surgery, because of previous mobbing in editorial office, death threats from Switzerland which I reported to police, and about what Novi list was writing, death of my mother, and notice that I would be dismissed, I got sick.

Mr Kriletic told me to come to see him on 1st August of this year in 9:00. I answered that I would do that if I could.
On specialist check up on 30 July 2005. on xxx xxx, in xxx xxx, my status of sick leave from 29 July of this year opened in surgery of dr. xxx xxx, and strictly confirmed in diagnosis to cure myself at home with family and that I must keep away from all stress situations. Among others, stress situations are above described my position in Vjesnik’s office. All this you can check by the mentioned doctors, that is institutions, and medical file I can’t submit to you, because it is considered as medical secret.

Considering that Employment council didn’t find necessary to inform you about mentioned declaration, I will do that personally, no matter further steps of Management, connected with announcement that I will get Irregular dismissal of working contract.

Best regards,

Journalist

Zeljko Peratovic

In Zagreb, 3 August 2005

Franjo Maletic – Vjesnik

Saturday, September 10th, 2005
Vjesnik Ltd.
Slavonska avenija 4
10 000 Zagreb

President of the board:
FRANJO MALETIC
Telephone: 61 61 700
Fax: 36 41 606

Franjo Maletic

Dear Sir,

I, Zeljko Peratovic, beneath signed journalist of column Croatia in daily newspapers Vjesnik, on recommendation of Employment council of Vjesnik Ltd., submit to you declaration about your Suggestion from 25 July 2005. to give me Irregular dismissal of working contract because of heavy violation of working duty, and which on 28 July 2005. I submited to Employment council on its demand.

On that date, when I have sent an official letter to the Council, I was told that Management would be informed about that.
However, the next day, on 29 July 2005. I got a phone call from Mr Kriletic from Vjesnik’s management office to come and collect my dismissal letter. I told him that I couldn’t because I was in surgery, because of previous mobbing in editorial office, death threats from Switzerland which I reported to police, and about what Novi list was writing, death of my mother, and notice that I would be dismissed, I got sick.

Mr Kriletic told me to come to see him on 1st August of this year in 9:00. I answered that I would do that if I could.
On specialist check up on 30 July 2005. on xxx xxx, in xxx xxx, my status of sick leave from 29 July of this year opened in surgery of dr. xxx xxx, and strictly confirmed in diagnosis to cure myself at home with family and that I must keep away from all stress situations. Among others, stress situations are above described my position in Vjesnik’s office. All this you can check by the mentioned doctors, that is institutions, and medical file I can’t submit to you, because it is considered as medical secret.

Considering that Employment council didn’t find necessary to inform you about mentioned declaration, I will do that personally, no matter further steps of Management, connected with announcement that I will get Irregular dismissal of working contract.

Best regards,

Journalist

Zeljko Peratovic

In Zagreb, 3 August 2005