Posts Tagged ‘Gotovina’s lobby’

Pukanic: Peratovic is ridiculous

Wednesday, November 5th, 2008

British deception proven

…It all started on 10 June 2003 when Nacional ran an interview with the runaway General Gotovina. That I had met with him was a fact known not even by his attorneys Luka Misetic and Marin Ivanovic, as I worked out the details in the greatest discretion with attorney Marijan Pedisic, a friend of mine, who passed away just over a year ago. We met with Gotovina in a hotel in Venice…

Both Mesic and chief Hague prosecutor Carla Del Ponte were informed of the messages and the interview before it was published. Del Ponte sent her top crew, headed by Patrick Lopez Tereza, to Pantovcak to see what could be done about it. Mesic charged his chief of staff Zeljko Bagic to speak with them, who he informed of what Gotovina had said…

And when I was already convinced that the crisis would end favourably for all and that Gotovina would finally come home, the blows came, above all from the press, but from all quarters. They led to a break off of the talks, and a loss of mutual trust, with serious consequences for Croatia, which as a result of the sabotage of those talks did not accede to the Union three years ago.

The responsible parties are known today. Some media houses, Jutarnji list and Globus foremost among them, followed by Feral and HTV, criticised both the initiative and me. President Mesic, who publicly supported the idea, was also attacked, even so far as to demand he relinquish his post. Journalists like Gordan Malic, Ivan Zvonimir Cicak, Ivica Djikic, Denis Kuljis, from HTV led by Zoran Sprajc, right up to the most ridiculous of them, Zeljko Peratovic, who claimed from his laughable Internet portal that I had met with Gotovina at Mesic’s Pantovcak residence. I was subject to daily attacks. I could not believe the just how much malice there was among journalists. The chief theory put forward by the press at the time was Gotovina was in Croatia, and there were constant alleged sightings of Gotovina in Croatia appearing the newspapers…

Ivo Pukanić, Nacional, 18.09.2008. | nr. 670

  • Share/Bookmark

Five Croatian journalists in case Gotovina

Sunday, March 20th, 2005
Epilogues of parliamentary investigation of accusations against five Croatian journalists in case Gotovina
The Council for supervision of security services of Parliament, has sent me a letter on 10 of March, in which was said that in their investigation, and marking mutual Preissue (Memorandum) of five journalists, was defined that our human rights were violated reasonlessly. The Council has sent that inference to the Committee for internal politics and national security.
On Thursday 15th, the Committee has draw a conclusion that there was founded doubt that our human rights were violated, but POA (counterintelligence service) didn’ t make any illegal steps. By the Parliamentary report in 2004., POA didn’t secretly supervised Ivica Djikic, Marijo Kavain, Ivanka Toma and Zeljko Peratovic, but by tracking foreign citizens under suspicion of being foreign spies, POA has overheard Gordan Malic. But, Malic is only «collateral damage», as in some previous statements said even President Stjepan Mesic.

He said that he had to compare the report he was presented with and the recent media reports stating that some reporters were placed under surveillance by the POA during the term of former POA chief Franjo Turek.

Asked if he believed that reporters were intentionally misinforming the public to obstruct Croatia’s integration with the EU, Mesic said that there was no such plan, but that reporters often presented unverified information.

Mesic’s statement

Nevertheless, the Committee has sent its report to the Office of Council for national security, on which also President Mesic called upon, when he at the end of 2004. asked for resignation of Josko Podbevsek, in case Puljiz, and to principal state attorney Mladen Bajic.
It is still not clear to me why are the reports of investigation has been sent to principal state attorney, if the conclusion was that Turek hasn’ t made any illegal steps. Mladen Bajic has received in 2003. POA’ s report about my «disinformations» that Gotovina was on vacation on island Kaprije, near Sibenik. Turek was regularlly informing Bajic, also other members in high state functions, about his operative activities in tracking of work of ICTY, right Croatian intelligence undreground, and several of us journalists, about spreading disinformations about Gotovina. POA has sent such kinds of informations to Bajic more than it were in widely known Turek’s presentation to Stjepan Mesic, Ivo Sanader, Vesna Skare Ozbolt and Marijan Mlinaric. Based on that informations, principal state attorney could in 2003. or 2004. conclude, that Turek is illegaly spying on us or that he is violating our human rights, by unsolidly slandering us for being collaborators of foreign secret services, of ICTY and that we are spreading disinformations about Gotovina.
Jarnjak and Karamarko
Ivan Jarnjak, Tomislav Matijevic and Tomislav Karamarko
Except that my human rights were violated, I did’ t get the answers from my Memorandum, did POA at the end of last year opened my letters (the letter of President of Parliamentary Committee for human rights Furio Radin). Why I still have in POA the file which was filled in after 90-ties?
The Parliament did’ t answer me also did POA and Military security service spy on me in 2003., in time of my writings about Gotovina’s habitations in Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina.
If my human rights were violated by Franjo Turek’s statements that I was spreading disinformations that Gotovina was in Croatia, does that mean that Parliament says that my information was right, or only that I had right to write about possible habitations of fugitive general?
Because of lots of other unclearness and feeling that I still did’ t get the satisfaction, with help of attorney I will ask for new oppinions of Parliamentary Council for human rights and Public attorney of Croatia.
I will also prepare statement of claim against UPI and Washington Times, because I have at least the official confirmation that I’ m not the spy of MI-6.
I also plan to sue Republic Croatia for endangering of human rights.
This conclusions of Parliamentary Committee, on whose head is prominent member of ruling party HDZ, Ivan Jarnjak, did not make any better the situation of my human rights. My texts about problem of secret services are still not publishing, situation about Gotovina, investigations about war crimes, organized criminal activity.
So, my writings, from the side of Government of Ivo Sanader, are still considered as «disinformations which could damage the interests of Croatia».
I don’ t think that I’m damaging the interests of Croatia if I warn that for entering in EU (which is proclaimed interest of Croatia) is bad because somebody from the government (neverthless if that is Mesic, Sanader, Bajic or Karamarko) submited British non paper with suggestions how disable the net of Gotovina’s helpers.
I think that Carla Del Ponte is right when she says that she gives the informations to the Croatian government about Gotovina and his helpers, and at the same time the informations leak to Gotovina and his net, and end up in medias which support him Nacional and Hrvatski list.
I’ m afraid that investigation about spying and slandering of Croatian journalists will be used only for accusation against Franjo Turek, that he obstructed the work of ICTY.
Ivica Djikic in Feral Tribune, number 1017. warns that agents of Tomislav Karamarko prepare accusing suggestion against Turek, and that accusation should be of use for the government as an evidence for fully cooperation with ICTY (without to detect, arrest and deliver Ante Gotovina). Supposedly, the government believes that with the accusation against Turek will get inclination of Carla Del Ponte and EU and in June or July we might start the negotiations with EU.
If the government concentrates only on sacrifising Franjo Turek, and not do anything to check informations is Gotovina moving in area Middle Dalmatia-Lika (Udbina)-Grahovo-Glamoc-Livno-Western Herzegovina, I think by the summer Carla Del Ponte will have negative oppinion about full cooperation with ICTY.
By my informations, the tactics of waiting for fugitive general to cross from Croatia to Bosnia, after what the Croatian government will inform EUFOR, who will than arrest him in helicopter landing operation, even now appears to be failure.
Gotovina’s lobby – retired generals Ante Roso, Markica Rebic, brother Boro Gotovina, Zeljko Dilber, Ante Zoni Maksan and others from his net, stimulate bad mood against the government of Ivo Sanader – distribution of posters and leaflets with support to Gotovina, establishing new association of war invalids, which will lead anti ICTY demonstrations…
Boro Gotovina even publicly threats to everybody to suffer adversity if the fovernment set off on his brother.
I don’ t know why public shouldn’ t know that investigation about POA and five journalists was of the most benefit for Tomislav Karamarko, who by its conclusions, gets more and more power in Croatian intelligence community. Government, the President’s Office, and Parliament already unofficialy considering his lawful suggestion to establish again Office for national security, which would control the work of military and civilian agency. Karamarko intends to abolish Intelligence agency (former HIS) and attach it to POA.
On the other side, the investigation about POA, was of benefit for Sasa Perkovic, who at the middle of 2004. had to leave the job of chief’ s assistant of Intelligence agency under pressure of Premier Sanader, and with some of his movements helped to fugitive tycoon Hrvoje Petrac.
When Gordan Malic’s text appeared in Globus that Franjo Turek was accusing Sasa Perkovic and his father Josip Perkovic for cooperating with former chief of police Ranko Ostojic, without waiting the results of Parliamentary investigations, President Mesic appointed Sasa Perkovic for his adviser for national security. Circles close to President’ s office say that Sasa’s father is now known high functionry of Yugoslav secret police (UDB-a) Josip Perkovic, made such influence on President Mesic, that he asked to his son in law Darko Grdic, employed in Croatian mission in NATO, become new chief of Headquarters of military forces of Republic Croatia.
By sources close to government of Ivo Sanader, Josip Perkovic intruted himself for main adviser of Tomislav Karamarko on planning actions of POA, by which should be shown that Croatia is doing all in its power to implement full cooperation with ICTY.
I’ m critical about that scenario because I think that is antilustrational.
Franjo Turek didn’ t commit most of his sins only by his own guilt, but it was order from the politics. Intelligence agents who drew benefit now are not better than him, even they have much bigger professional stains in the past.

Punishing Turek will not get Croatia any closer to Europe, or bring reversal in political manipulations of secret services. On the contrary, this is only another one in the queue of manipulations.

  • Share/Bookmark

POA, Prezentacija, Globus

Friday, February 11th, 2005

Five reporters urge investigation into reports that they were under surveillance by POA
ZAGREB, Feb 7 (Hina) – Five Croatian journalists on Monday sent a letter to the Croatian Journalists’ Association (HND), parliamentary committees on national security and human rights, and the Council for the Civilian Supervision of Intelligence Services, urging an investigation into an article from the Globus weekly saying that the Counterintelligence Agency (POA), led by its former chief Franjo Turek, had tapped their phones in 2003 and 2004 because they were suspected of participating in a media-intelligence campaign against Croatia.
Reporters Gordan Malic of the Globus weekly, Zeljko Peratovic of the Vjesnik daily, Mario Kavain of the Jutarnji List daily and Ivica Djikic of the Feral Tribune weekly said their request referred to the article of February 4 headlined “Turek’s Presentation“, which contained POA documents which they said constituted a grave libel on their work.
The reporters said that a POA document, published in the article under the title “Information on intelligence-media manipulation aimed at discrediting Croatia”, covered their articles on investigations by the Hague war crimes tribunal, the functioning of security services etc., describing their work as “a premeditated, organised and coordinated campaign to disseminate misinformation jeopardising national security”.
The reporters warned that the document bore proof that some of them, including journalist and “Jutarnji List” editor Davor Butkovic, were placed under temporary surveillance by the POA in 2003 and 2004 and that Peratovic and Boris Pavelic of the Novi List daily were also believed to have been under surveillance.
“We have therefore concluded that during the term of its former chief Franjo Turek, the POA acted unlawfully against a number of Croatian journalists to construe the monstrous ‘Information on intelligence-media manipulation aimed at discrediting Croatia’ and depict our articles as dangerous for national security,” reads the joint request of the five journalists.
Notwithstanding the dark past of our secret services, this kind of campaign against journalists is unprecedented,” reads the request
The journalists urged the HND, the parliamentary committees and the Council for the Civilian Supervision of Intelligence Services to respond to the latest article considering that senior government officials have denied the existence of such a presentation or that the POA acted unlawfully in this case.
They also urged the HND to inform domestic and foreign public of their case and request a response from state institutions, as well as to press charges against those responsible for the case.
According to the Globus weekly, the POA stated that the said journalists and several foreign reporters were suspected of swaying the public opinion in Croatia in collusion with individuals from foreign institutions by disseminating misinformation about the whereabouts of General Ante Gotovina, who is wanted by the Hague war crimes tribunal.
The POA document read that by doing so the reporters were discrediting Croatian institutions, exerting pressure on Croatia and slowing down its integration into the European Union.
(Hina) 07.02.2005. 14:45 MET
Enis ZEBIĆ
Petero hrvatskih novinara – Gordan Malić iz „Globusa“, Ivanka Toma i Mario Kavajin iz „Jutarnjeg lista“, Ivica Đikić iz „Ferala“ i Željko Peratović iz „Vjesnika“, uputilo je danas zahtjev Hrvatskom novinarskom društvu, saborskim odborima za nacionalnu sigurnost i ljudska prava, te Vijeću za civilni nadzor sigurnosnih službi, kojim traže da istraže navode iz tjednika „Globus“ kako ih je Protuobavještajna agencija (POA), na čelu s bivšim ravnateljem Franjom Turekom, tijekom 2003. i 2004. godine prisluškivala pod sumnjom da sudjeluju u medijsko-obavještajnoj kampanji protiv Hrvatske. Oni se pozivaju na tekst u najnovijem broju ovog tjednika, pod naslovom „Turekova prezentacija“, u kojemu su objavljeni dokumenti POA-e kojima se, tvrde novinari, teško kleveće njihov rad.
Detalje u izjavi za Radio Slobodna Evropa pojašnjava novinar „VjesnikaŽeljko Peratović:
Reagiramo sada na potvrđene informacije da nas je POA nadzirala, obrađivala i prezentirala naš novinarski rad državnom vrhu kao neprijateljsku djelatnost, usmjerenu protiv interesa Republike Hrvatske, a koja se očitovala u širenju dezinformacija da je general Gotovina u Hrvatskoj, a za račun britanske tajne službe. Mi se protivimo tim klevetama Protuobavještajne agencije, smatramo da smo nezakonito nadzirani, da je POA trebala obavljati svoj posao i tražiti generala Gotovinu, a ne nadzirati novinare.
Peratović, kojem ovo nije prvi put da zbog novinarskog rada ima posla sa tajnim službama, vjeruje da bi inicijativa petero novinara mogla imati dalekosežne pozitivne posljedice:
Mislim da će ovo što je objavio kolega Malić i ova naša zajednička inicijativa doprinijeti tome da se to napokon raščisti, da ovaj put novinari neće poslužiti kao sredstvo zapravo možda nekim višim političkim ciljevima, nekim političkim obračunima, ili da se smijeni šef neke tajne službe da bi se doveo neki drugi. Mislim da bi to trebalo na koncu i rezultirati kaznenom prijavom protiv odgovornih. Do sada mi imamo i naslijeđe Udbe s kojim nismo raščistili, nasljeđe Tuđmanovih tajnih službi koje su se bavile ne samo prisluškivanjem novinara nego i ratnim zločinima i švercale drogu i to do sada nije bilo sankcionirano. Nadam se da je prilika da se naprosto jednom podvuče crta i da netko od tih šefova kazneno odgovara, a ne samo da podnese ostavku, pa da mu kasnije predsjednik države ili premijer ponudi mjesto u diplomaciji.“
Predsjednik Hrvatskog novinarskog društva Dragutin Lučić Luce upozorava u izjavi za Radio Slobodna Evropa da se, čini se, sprema i kaznena prijava protiv autora tog teksta u tjedniku „Globus“, Gordana Malića, jer je objavio dokument sa oznakom državne tajne:
Međutim, treba podsjetiti na pozitivno zakonodavstvo u Hrvatskoj i na stavove Međunarodnog suda za ljudska prava u Strasburu i na ostale konvencije koje štite ljudska prava i medijske slobode, u kojima se doslovce kaže da je novinar slobodan od svake optužbe kad objavi bilo koji dokument, pa i tajni, ukoliko je to motivirano posebnim javnim interesom, a to je u ovom slučaju posve bjelodano. Naime, o tom se dokumentu već govori mjesecima i on je više-manje cijeloj javnosti poznat. Možda je tek sad po prvi put u jednom originalnom obliku ugledao svjetlo dana.“
Predsjednik Novinarskog društva, Lučić, sastat će se u srijedu sa petero prozvanih novinara, kako bi dogovorili dalje akcije.
Radio Slobodna Evropa 07. 02. 2005., 18,30 h

Novinari traže istragu o navodima da ih je prisluškivala POA

Petero novinara poslalo je zahtjev službenim organima za pokretanjem istrage o navodima iznesenim u Globusu – da ih je Protuobavještajna agencija pod ravnanjem Franje Tureka tijekom 2003. i 2004. prisluškivala pod sumnjom da sudjeluju u medijsko-obavještajnoj kampanji protiv Hrvatske.
“Tražimo da se ispita famozna prezentacija Franje Tureka u kojoj je on optužio niz hrvatskih novinara da rade za britansku tajnu službu i servisiraju domaće obavještajno podzemlje šireći dezinformacije da je general Gotovina u Hrvatskoj.”, rekao nam je jedan od prozvanih novinara, Željko Peratović.
Kolege u istom sosu su Gordan Malić, Ivanka Toma, Mario Kavain i Ivica Đikić. “U toj prezentaciji koju je prošli tjedan objavio tjednik Globus, vidljivo je da su neki novinari bili izloženi mjerama tajnog nadzora, da su fotografirani i da su im prisluškivani telefoni. Tražimo, ne samo da se utvrdi da li je bilo nezakonitog postupanja POA-e, nego da se ispita da li još uvijek imamo dossier u POA-i, zašto nas se klevetalo da smo strani špijuni, i zašto se POA bavila nama umjesto Gotovinom i njegovim pomagačima.”, dodao je Peratović. Iako je tajnim dokumentom koji je objavio Globus uvtrđeno da su neki od novinara, uključujući Davora Butkovića bili pod mjerama nadzora POA-e, bivši ravnatelj Turek tvrdi da je sve rađeno po zakonu i da nije bilo nikakvih prisluškivanja. Franjo, osim toga, tvrdi da nisu praćeni novinari već strani obavještajci, a da su novinari s njima kontaktirali pa su, valjda, postali dijelom istrage. Kako piše Jutarnji list, Turek kaže da je POA pratila strane obavještajce, a ne djelatnike Haškog suda, “bez obzira kako se oni uokolo predstavljaju”. Prema objavljenoj prezentaciji vidljivo je da je POA nadzirala i bivšeg ravnatelja policije Ranka Ostojića te glasnogovornicu MUP-a Zinku Bardić. Kao što je poznato, Protuobavještajna agencija podnijela je kaznenu prijavu protiv nepoznatih počinitelja zbog odavanja državne tajne tekstovima u tjedniku Globus. Potpisnik tekstova je Gordan Malić, koji pretpostavlja da se kaznena prijava odnosi na njega.
Radio 101, Aktualni 101, 07. 02. 2005., 18
  • Share/Bookmark